ArticleJournal of industrial microbiology & biotechnology2024
Control of industrially relevant microbial isolates by antimicrobial agents: Implications for sugar factories.
Article in Journal of industrial microbiology & biotechnology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Optimizing antimicrobial dosing of bacterial isolates from sugar beet factories to reduce sucrose losses.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Microbial isolates from sugar crop processing facilities were tested for sensitivity to several industrial antimicrobial agents to determine optimal dosing. Hydritreat 2216 showed broad-spectrum activity against all bacterial isolates as well as Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Sodium hypochlorite showed broad-spectrum activity against all isolates, but at much higher effective concentrations. Hops BetaStab XL was effective against Gram-positive isolates. Magna Cide D minimum inhibitory concentration was lowest for S. cerevisiae and Zymomonas mobilis but was less effective against Gram-positive bacterial strains. Based on laboratory experiments, factory losses of sucrose from a single microbial species in the absence of antimicrobials could range from 0.13 to 0.52 kg of sucrose per tonne of cane. Additional improvements in sugar yield are anticipated from agents with broad-spectrum activity. A cost analysis was conducted considering sucrose savings due to antimicrobial application to provide estimates for break-even costs, which ranged from approximately $0.50 to $2.00/L for a given antimicrobial agent. ONE-SENTENCE SUMMARY: Application of antimicrobial agents at minimal inhibitory doses for microbes results in optimal inhibition of microbial growth and sucrose consumption.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.