Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39779660›Full record

ArticleThe plant genome2025

Enhancing genomic-based forward prediction accuracy in wheat by integrating UAV-derived hyperspectral and environmental data with machine learning under heat-stressed environments.

Jordan McBreen, Md Ali Babar, Diego Jarquin, Yiannis Ampatzidis, Naeem Khan, Sudip Kunwar, Janam Prabhat Acharya, Samuel Adewale, Gina Brown-Guedira

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The plant genome, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jordan McBreenDepartment of Agronomy, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
Md Ali BabarDepartment of Agronomy, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9951-6856
Diego JarquinDepartment of Agronomy, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5098-2060
Yiannis AmpatzidisAgricultural and Biological Engineering Department, Southwest Florida Research and Education Center, University of Florida, IFAS, Immokalee, Florida, USA.
Naeem KhanDepartment of Agronomy, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
Sudip KunwarDepartment of Agronomy, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
Janam Prabhat AcharyaDepartment of Agronomy, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
Samuel AdewaleDepartment of Agronomy, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
Gina Brown-GuediraUSDA-ARS Southeast Area, Plant Science Research, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1958-2827

Funding

Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences (IFAS) and World Food Crops Breeding Program
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Integrating genomic, hyperspectral imaging (HSI), and environmental data enhances wheat yield predictions, with HSI providing detailed spectral insights for predicting complex grain yield (GY) traits. Incorporating HSI data with single nucleotide polymorphic markers (SNPs) resulted in a substantial improvement in predictive ability compared to the conventional genomic prediction models. Over the course of several years, the prediction ability varied due to diverse weather conditions. The most comprehensive parametric model tested, which included SNPs, HSI, and environmental covariates data, consistently achieved the best results, closely followed by machine learning (ML) approaches when considering the same omics data. For example, the most comprehensive model (M9), under the forward prediction cross-validation scheme, predicted the GY of the 2023 growing season using data from 2021 and 2022 for a correlation between predicted and observed values of 0.53. This model demonstrated superior performance compared to less complex models, emphasizing the advantage of integrating numerous data sources and their interactive effects. Furthermore, when comparing the top 25% of the predicted lines versus the corresponding observed lines with the highest GY, the M9 model returned a coincide index (CI) of 55% (i.e., in both sets, 55% of the top 25% values were common), whereas for the highest performing ML model (gradient boosting regression), the CI was of 46%. This study highlights the potential of multi-data source approaches to accelerate the selection of heat-tolerant wheat genotypes.

Indexed as

Machine LearningTriticumGenomicsHeat-Shock ResponseHyperspectral ImagingPolymorphism, Single NucleotideRemote Sensing Technology

Identifiers

PMID39779660
PMCPMC11711122

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.