ArticleScientific reports2025
Identification and validation of a metabolic-related gene risk model predicting the prognosis of lung, colon, and breast cancers.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Metabolic reprogramming, vital for cancer cells to adapt to the altered microenvironment, remains a topic requiring further investigation for different tumor types. Our study aims to elucidate shared metabolic reprogramming across breast (BRC), colorectal (CRC), and lung (LUC) cancers. Leveraging gene expression data from the Gene Expression Omnibus and various bioinformatics tools like MSigDB, WebGestalt, String, and Cytoscape, we identified key/hub metabolism-related genes (MRGs) and their interactions. The functional characteristics including survival parameters and expression of the key MRGs were analyzed and validated through Gene Expression Profiling Interactive Analysis 2 and qRT-PCR. In addition, we employed machine learning algorithms such as k-nearest neighbours (KNN), support vector regressor (SVR), and extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) to assess MRGs' effectiveness in predicting overall patient survival. Among 11,384 DEGs analyzed, 540 overlapped across BRC, CRC, and LUC, with 46 MRGs and 20 key/hub MRGs involved in all studied cancer types. Of these, 11 key MRGs were prognostically significant. The qRT-PCR validation of key MRGs in specific cancer cell lines confirmed their expression profiles, with some showing cell-type-specific patterns. SVR exhibited remarkable accuracy in predicting overall survival, emphasizing its clinical utility. Our integrated approach combining bioinformatics analyses and experimental validations underscores the potential of MRGs as biomarkers for metabolic therapies, with machine learning models enhancing predictive capabilities for patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.