Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39779821›Full record

ArticleNature neuroscience2025

A distinct hypothalamus-habenula circuit governs risk preference.

Dominik Groos, Anna Maria Reuss, Peter Rupprecht, Tevye Stachniak, Christopher Lewis, Shuting Han, Adrian Roggenbach, Oliver Sturman, Yaroslav Sych, Martin Wieckhorst and 4 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Histamine HMolecular psychiatry · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Dominik GroosBrain Research Institute, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland. groos@hifo.uzh.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1178-1354
Anna Maria Reuss *Neuroscience Center Zurich, University of Zurich and ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Peter Rupprecht *Brain Research Institute, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8235-8257
Tevye StachniakBrain Research Institute, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2498-5783
Christopher LewisBrain Research Institute, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8362-1248
Shuting HanBrain Research Institute, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9315-3089
Adrian RoggenbachBrain Research Institute, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3072-0733
Oliver SturmanNeuroscience Center Zurich, University of Zurich and ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6859-4800
Yaroslav SychBrain Research Institute, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1822-8631
Martin WieckhorstBrain Research Institute, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Johannes BohacekNeuroscience Center Zurich, University of Zurich and ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8442-653X
Theofanis KarayannisBrain Research Institute, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3267-6254
Adriano AguzziNeuroscience Center Zurich, University of Zurich and ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Fritjof HelmchenBrain Research Institute, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland. helmchen@hifo.uzh.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8867-9569

Funding

Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (Swiss National Science Foundation) 310030-127091
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Appropriate risk evaluation is essential for survival in complex, uncertain environments. Confronted with choosing between certain (safe) and uncertain (risky) options, animals show strong preference for either option consistently across extended time periods. How such risk preference is encoded in the brain remains elusive. A candidate region is the lateral habenula (LHb), which is prominently involved in value-guided behavior. Here, using a balanced two-alternative choice task and longitudinal two-photon calcium imaging in mice, we identify risk-preference-selective activity in LHb neurons reflecting individual risk preference before action selection. By using whole-brain anatomical tracing, multi-fiber photometry and projection-specific and cell-type-specific optogenetics, we find glutamatergic LHb projections from the medial (MH) but not lateral (LH) hypothalamus providing behavior-relevant synaptic input before action selection. Optogenetic stimulation of MH→LHb axons evoked excitatory and inhibitory postsynaptic responses, whereas LH→LHb projections were excitatory. We thus reveal functionally distinct hypothalamus-habenula circuits for risk preference in habitual economic decision-making.

Indexed as

Choice BehaviorHabenulaHypothalamusNerve NetAnimalsAxonsBehavior, AnimalCalciumEvoked PotentialsFemaleMaleMiceRisk FactorsCalcium

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.