SynthesisBMC neurology2025
Trigeminal neuralgia improvement following Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS): a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in BMC neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Advanced, pharmacological and complementary interventions for chronic or recurrent orofacial pain conditions: a systematic evidence map with selective meta-analyses.The journal of headache and pain · 2026Pooled it
- Randomized Pilot Study of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation for Neuropathic/Nociplastic Ocular Pain.American journal of ophthalmology · 2026Trial
- Neuromodulation Techniques Alleviating Neuropathic Pain by Targeting Microglia: A Narrative Review.Pain and therapy · 2026Review
- Immediate changes during dysesthesia-matched transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation in refractory neuropathic pain: a retrospective observational case series.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2026Observational
- Current landscape of newer non-invasive brain stimulation in psychiatric disorders across South Asia.Indian journal of psychiatry · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTrigeminal neuralgia (TN) is a prevalent and debilitating craniofacial pain disorder characterized by severe, unilateral, shock-like pain. Standard treatments include anti-epileptic drugs and surgical interventions, but many patients experience limited relief or adverse effects. Non-invasive therapies, such as transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS), have emerged as alternative options. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy of TENS in managing primary trigeminal neuralgia.
methodsA comprehensive search of PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar was conducted, yielding 89 papers. Following selection criteria, five clinical trials involving 101 patients with primary TN and TENS treatment were included. Data on pain severity, TENS parameters, and outcomes were extracted. Statistical analysis was performed using RevMan software, with outcomes assessed using Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores before and after TENS treatment.
resultsPre-treatment VAS scores averaged 8.75 ± 0.18, indicating severe pain. Post-treatment, the mean VAS score significantly decreased to 1.17 ± 0.55, demonstrating substantial pain relief. The meta-analysis revealed a mean difference of 7.49 (95% CI: 7.05 to 7.93) in VAS scores, with a p-value < 0.05, indicating statistically significant pain reduction. Heterogeneity among studies was moderate (I
conclusionTENS appears to be an effective and safe intervention for reducing pain in patients with primary trigeminal neuralgia. Despite variability in treatment protocols and follow-up periods, the overall evidence supports TENS as a viable option for managing TN pain. Future research should focus on standardizing TENS protocols and evaluating long-term efficacy and safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.