Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39780067›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2025

Postdiagnostic use of antihypertensive medications and survival in colorectal, lung, corpus uteri, melanoma and kidney cancer patients with hypertension.

Rūta Everatt, Irena Kuzmickienė, Birutė Brasiūnienė, Ieva Vincerževskienė, Birutė Intaitė, Saulius Cicėnas, Ingrida Lisauskienė

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Rūta EverattLaboratory of Cancer Epidemiology, National Cancer Institute, Baublio 3B, Vilnius, LT-08406, Lithuania. ruta.everatt@nvi.lt.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4887-8894
Irena KuzmickienėLaboratory of Cancer Epidemiology, National Cancer Institute, Baublio 3B, Vilnius, LT-08406, Lithuania.
Birutė BrasiūnienėDepartment of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Institute, Vilnius, Lithuania.
Ieva VincerževskienėLaboratory of Clinical Oncology, National Cancer Institute, Vilnius, Lithuania.
Birutė IntaitėDepartment of Gynaecologic Oncology, National Cancer Institute, Vilnius, Lithuania.
Saulius CicėnasDepartment of Thoracic Surgery and Oncology, National Cancer Institute, Vilnius, Lithuania.
Ingrida LisauskienėInstitute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundArterial hypertension is one of the most frequent comorbidities in patients with cancer. Studies have indicated that drugs used to control hypertension may alter cancer patient survival; however, epidemiological findings for their impact on cancer survival remain inconsistent. The aim of this study was to examine the effect of the consumption of antihypertensive (AH) medication on the risk of death in cancer patients.

methodsThe association between 1-year postdiagnostic AH medication intake and the risk of death was examined in a population-based cohort of cancer patients including colorectal (N = 1104), lung (N = 344), melanoma (N = 334), corpus uteri (N = 832) and kidney cancer (N = 714), diagnosed between 2013 and 2015, and identified from the Lithuanian Cancer Registry. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs), and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) to assess associations between AH medications and cancer-specific and overall mortality.

resultsWe found a statistically significant decrease in mortality among colorectal cancer patients who were users of angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) (HR: 0.68, 95% CI: 0.47-0.98) or angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) (HR: 0.69, 95% CI: 0.52-0.91). A higher usage of ARBs and ACEIs was related to further improved colorectal cancer survival (HR 0.62, 95% CI: 0.39-1.00 and HR 0.60, 95% CI: 0.42-0.86, respectively). The subgroup analyses also demonstrated significantly better cancer specific survival in ARB users and ACEI users versus non-users in colorectal cancer patients with adenocarcinoma, surgery treatment, chemotherapy treatment and ARB or ACEI use before diagnosis. The results suggest a lower mortality among colorectal cancer patients with a higher usage of diuretics. Increased cancer-specific mortality was observed among corpus uteri cancer patients using ARBs and among melanoma patients using beta blockers (BBs); however, there was no evidence of consistent statistically significant associations in subgroup analyses.

conclusionThis study supports a link between ARB and ACEI use and increased survival among colorectal cancer patients. Further research is needed to provide a detailed evaluation of the effects of AH medications on cancer survival.

Indexed as

Antihypertensive AgentsColorectal NeoplasmsHypertensionKidney NeoplasmsLung NeoplasmsMelanomaUterine NeoplasmsAdultAgedAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme InhibitorsAngiotensin Receptor AntagonistsFemaleHumansLithuaniaMaleMiddle AgedAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme InhibitorsAngiotensin Receptor AntagonistsAntihypertensive AgentsAntihypertensive drugsCancer survivalColorectal cancerCorpus uteri cancerKidney cancerLung cancerMelanoma

Identifiers

PMID39780067
PMCPMC11707882

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.