Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39780223›Full record

ArticleCardiovascular diabetology2025

Predicting 28-day all-cause mortality in patients admitted to intensive care units with pre-existing chronic heart failure using the stress hyperglycemia ratio: a machine learning-driven retrospective cohort analysis.

Xiao-Han Li, Xing-Long Yang, Bin-Bin Dong, Qi Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cardiovascular diabetology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. CFDFrontiers in immunology · 2026
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Xiao-Han LiDepartment of Emergency Intensive Care Unit, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, No.1st, Jian She Eastern Road, Zhengzhou, 450052, Henan Province, People's Republic of China.
Xing-Long YangDepartment of Emergency Intensive Care Unit, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, No.1st, Jian She Eastern Road, Zhengzhou, 450052, Henan Province, People's Republic of China.
Bin-Bin DongDepartment of Emergency Intensive Care Unit, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, No.1st, Jian She Eastern Road, Zhengzhou, 450052, Henan Province, People's Republic of China.
Qi LiuDepartment of Emergency Intensive Care Unit, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, No.1st, Jian She Eastern Road, Zhengzhou, 450052, Henan Province, People's Republic of China. fccliux@zzu.edu.cn.

Funding

Henan Province Medical Education Project WJLX2023025Leader Project of Henan Province Health Young and Middle-aged Professor HNSWJW2020013National Science and Technology Major Project 2023ZD0505500 and 2023ZD0505501
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chronic heart failure (CHF) poses a significant threat to human health. The stress hyperglycemia ratio (SHR) is a novel metric for accurately assessing stress hyperglycemia, which has been correlated with adverse outcomes in various major diseases. However, it remains unclear whether SHR is associated with 28-day mortality in patients with pre-existing CHF who were admitted to intensive care units (ICUs). This study retrospectively recruited patients who were admitted to ICUs with both acute critical illness and pre-existing CHF from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC) database. Characteristics were compared between the survival and non-survival groups. The relationship between SHR and 28-day all-cause mortality was analyzed using restricted cubic splines, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, and Cox proportional hazards regression analysis. The importance of the potential risk factors was assessed using the Boruta algorithm. Prediction models were constructed using machine learning algorithms. A total of 913 patients were enrolled. The risk of 28-day mortality increased with higher SHR levels (P < 0.001). SHR was independently associated with 28-day all-cause mortality, with an unadjusted hazard ratio (HR) of 1.45 (P < 0.001) and an adjusted HR of 1.43 (P < 0.001). Subgroup analysis found that none of the potential risk factors, such as demographics, comorbidities, and drugs, affected the relationship (P for interaction > 0.05). The area under the ROC (AUC) curve for SHR was larger than those for admission blood glucose and HbA1c; the cut-off for SHR was 0.57. Patients with SHR higher than the cut-off had a significantly lower 28-day survival probability (P < 0.001). SHR was identified as one of the key factors for 28-day mortality by the Boruta algorithm. The predictive performance was verified through four machine learning algorithms, with the neural network algorithm being the best (AUC 0.801). For patients with both acute critical illness and pre-existing CHF, SHR was an independent predictor of 28-day all-cause mortality. Its prognostic performance surpasses those of HbA1c and blood glucose, and prognostic models based on SHR provide clinicians with an effective tool to make therapeutic decisions.

Indexed as

BiomarkersBlood GlucoseCause of DeathHeart FailureHyperglycemiaIntensive Care UnitsMachine LearningPatient AdmissionPredictive Value of TestsAgedAged, 80 and overChronic DiseaseDatabases, FactualDecision Support TechniquesFemaleHumansBiomarkersBlood GlucoseChronic heart failureMachine learningMortalityRisk factorStress hyperglycemia ratio

Identifiers

PMID39780223
PMCPMC11714879

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.