Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39780602›Full record

ReviewPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2025

Sustainable high-yield farming is essential for bending the curve of biodiversity loss.

Andrew Balmford, Ian J Bateman, Alison Eyres, Tom Swinfield, Thomas S Ball

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. A global assessment of animal community responses to agricultural management.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Beyond yields: a systems approach is essential for reconciling agriculture and biodiversity.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Article
  9. How should we bend the curve of biodiversity loss to build a just and sustainable future?Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Andrew BalmfordDepartment of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0144-3589
Ian J BatemanUniversity of Exeter Business School, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2791-6137
Alison EyresDepartment of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7866-7559
Tom SwinfieldDepartment of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Thomas S BallDepartment of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8508-6445

Funding

TSB was funded by UK Research and Innovation's BBSRC through the Mandala Consortium
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Food production does more damage to wild species than any other sector of human activity, yet how best to limit its growing impact is greatly contested. Reviewing progress to date in interventions that encourage less damaging diets or cut food loss and waste, we conclude that both are essential but far from sufficient. In terms of production, field studies from five continents quantifying the population-level impacts of land sharing, land sparing, intermediate and mixed approaches for almost 2000 individually assessed species show that implementing high-yield farming to spare natural habitats consistently outperforms land sharing, particularly for species of highest conservation concern. Sparing also offers considerable potential for mitigating climate change. Delivering land sparing nevertheless raises several important challenges-in particular, identifying and promoting higher yielding farm systems that are less environmentally harmful than current industrial agriculture, and devising mechanisms to limit rebound effects and instead tie yield gains to habitat conservation. Progress will depend on conservationists forging novel collaborations with the agriculture sector. While this may be challenging, we suggest that without it there is no realistic prospect of slowing biodiversity loss.This article is part of the discussion meeting issue 'Bending the curve towards nature recovery: building on Georgina Mace's legacy for a biodiverse future'.

Indexed as

AgricultureBiodiversityConservation of Natural ResourcesAnimalsClimate ChangeEcosystemSustainable Developmentbiodiversityfarmingfood productionland sparingland useyield

Identifiers

PMID39780602
PMCPMC11712281

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.