ArticleBrain communications2025
Machine learning-based prediction of disease progression in primary progressive multiple sclerosis.
Article in Brain communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01412333 (A Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy, Parallel-Group Study To Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Ocrelizumab in Comparison to Interferon Beta-1a), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy, Parallel-Group Study To Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Ocrelizumab in Comparison to Interferon Beta-1a (Rebif) in Patients With Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Synthetic MRI and radiomics in multiple sclerosis: improving precision in diagnosis and prognosis.Radiological physics and technology · 2026Review
- Mechanistic Insights into the Role of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in the Diagnosis and Management of Multiple Sclerosis.Pathophysiology : the official journal of the International Society for Pathophysiology · 2026Review
- AI-enabled Living Labs: Accelerating innovation in multiple sclerosis care and research.Multiple sclerosis (Houndmills, Basingstoke, England) · 2026Review
- Semi-Supervised Learning for Predicting Multiple Sclerosis.Journal of personalized medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Primary progressive multiple sclerosis (PPMS) affects 10-15% of multiple sclerosis patients and presents significant variability in the rate of disability progression. Identifying key biological features and patients at higher risk for fast progression is crucial to develop and optimize treatment strategies. Peripheral blood cell transcriptome has the potential to provide valuable information to predict patients' outcomes. In this study, we utilized a machine learning framework applied to the baseline blood transcriptional profiles and brain MRI radiological enumerations to develop prognostic models. These models aim to identify PPMS patients likely to experience significant disease progression and who could benefit from early treatment intervention. RNA-sequence analysis was performed on total RNA extracted from peripheral blood mononuclear cells of PPMS patients in the placebo arm of the ORATORIO clinical trial (NCT01412333), using Illumina NovaSeq S2. Cross-validation algorithms from Partek Genome Suite (www.partek.com) were applied to predict disability progression and brain volume loss over 120 weeks. For disability progression prediction, we analysed blood RNA samples from 135 PPMS patients (61 females and 74 males) with a mean ± standard error age of 44.0 ± 0.7 years, disease duration of 5.9 ± 0.32 years and a median baseline Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score of 4.3 (range 3.5-6.5). Over the 120-week study, 39.3% (53/135) of patients reached the disability progression end-point, with an average EDSS score increase of 1.3 ± 0.16. For brain volume loss prediction, blood RNA samples from 94 PPMS patients (41 females and 53 males), mean ± standard error age of 43.7 ± 0.7 years and a median baseline EDSS of 4.0 (range 3.0-6.5) were used. Sixty-seven per cent (63/94) experienced significant brain volume loss. For the prediction of disability progression, we developed a two-level procedure. In the first level, a 10-gene predictor achieved a classification accuracy of 70.9 ± 4.5% in identifying patients reaching the disability end-point within 120 weeks. In the second level, a four-gene classifier distinguished between fast and slow disability progression with a 506-day cut-off, achieving 74.1 ± 5.2% accuracy. For brain volume loss prediction, a 12-gene classifier reached an accuracy of 70.2 ± 6.7%, which improved to 74.1 ± 5.2% when combined with baseline brain MRI measurements. In conclusion, our study demonstrates that blood transcriptome data, alone or combined with baseline brain MRI metrics, can effectively predict disability progression and brain volume loss in PPMS patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.