Observational studyDrug design, development and therapy2025
Efficacy and Safety of Ciprofol for Anesthesia in Painless Colonoscopy with Varying Body Mass Indices Patients: A Prospective, Single-Center, Observational Study.
Observational study in Drug design, development and therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Ciprofol versus propofol for sedation in colonoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Brazilian journal of anesthesiology (Elsevier)Pooled it
- The effects of ciprofol and propofol on hypoxemia during gastrointestinal endoscopy in overweight and obese patients: a randomized controlled trial.BMC anesthesiology · 2025Trial
- Methodological Considerations Regarding Respiratory Safety and Recovery in Overweight or Obese Patients Undergoing Painless Gastroscopy.Drug design, development and therapy · 2026Article
- The Median Effective Dose of Ciprofol Combined with Sufentanil for Inhibiting Responses to Gastroscope Insertion in Obese Patients: A Prospective, Single-Center Study.Drug design, development and therapy · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Ciprofol, a novel intravenous anesthetic derived from propofol, exhibits high lipophilicity. Its pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics may vary across different body mass indices (BMI) categories, but data on its optimal dosing as well as its safety and efficacy during colonoscopy anesthesia in varying BMI groups are lacking. Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of ciprofol during anesthesia for painless colonoscopy in patients with varying BMI, and to explore the correlation between BMI and induction dose. Methods: The BMI classification standard used in this study followed the criteria used in China. This prospective, single-center, observational study enrolled two hundred patients and they were divided into three groups with BMI: Group A (18.5-23.9 kg/m²), Group B (24-27.9 kg/m²), and Group C (28-39.9 kg/m²). Ciprofol was administered slowly (3 seconds per milliliter) until MOAA/S ≤1. Induction dose, additional ciprofol use, procedure duration, recovery time, vital signs, and adverse events were recorded. Results: The total induction dose was higher in Groups B and C than in Group A, with Group C receiving the highest dose (P<0.001). Dose per kilogram of TBW was lower in Groups B and C (P<0.001), while corrected body weight (CBW)-based dosing showed no significant difference between groups (P=0.287). There were no significant differences in procedure duration, recovery time, or adverse events among groups. Conclusion: Ciprofol is safe and effective for colonoscopy anesthesia across BMI groups, offering stable hemodynamics without prolonging recovery or increasing adverse events. CBW is a reliable dosing metric for overweight and obese patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.