Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39781446›Full record

Observational studyDrug design, development and therapy2025

Efficacy and Safety of Ciprofol for Anesthesia in Painless Colonoscopy with Varying Body Mass Indices Patients: A Prospective, Single-Center, Observational Study.

Yaqi Li, Mailong Yuan, Ping Zhang, Tao Zhou, Mingsheng Zhang, Jinhui Xu

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Drug design, development and therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yaqi LiDepartment of Anesthesiology, Jiangxi Provincial People's Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang Medical College, Nanchang, Jiangxi, 330006, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0009-0002-9946-7390
Mailong YuanDepartment of Anesthesiology, Jiangxi Provincial People's Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang Medical College, Nanchang, Jiangxi, 330006, People's Republic of China.
Ping ZhangDepartment of Anesthesiology, Jiangxi Provincial People's Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang Medical College, Nanchang, Jiangxi, 330006, People's Republic of China.
Tao ZhouDepartment of Anesthesiology, Jiangxi Provincial People's Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang Medical College, Nanchang, Jiangxi, 330006, People's Republic of China.
Mingsheng ZhangDepartment of Anesthesiology, Jiangxi Provincial People's Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang Medical College, Nanchang, Jiangxi, 330006, People's Republic of China.
Jinhui XuDepartment of Anesthesiology, Jiangxi Provincial People's Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang Medical College, Nanchang, Jiangxi, 330006, People's Republic of China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Ciprofol, a novel intravenous anesthetic derived from propofol, exhibits high lipophilicity. Its pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics may vary across different body mass indices (BMI) categories, but data on its optimal dosing as well as its safety and efficacy during colonoscopy anesthesia in varying BMI groups are lacking. Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of ciprofol during anesthesia for painless colonoscopy in patients with varying BMI, and to explore the correlation between BMI and induction dose. Methods: The BMI classification standard used in this study followed the criteria used in China. This prospective, single-center, observational study enrolled two hundred patients and they were divided into three groups with BMI: Group A (18.5-23.9 kg/m²), Group B (24-27.9 kg/m²), and Group C (28-39.9 kg/m²). Ciprofol was administered slowly (3 seconds per milliliter) until MOAA/S ≤1. Induction dose, additional ciprofol use, procedure duration, recovery time, vital signs, and adverse events were recorded. Results: The total induction dose was higher in Groups B and C than in Group A, with Group C receiving the highest dose (P<0.001). Dose per kilogram of TBW was lower in Groups B and C (P<0.001), while corrected body weight (CBW)-based dosing showed no significant difference between groups (P=0.287). There were no significant differences in procedure duration, recovery time, or adverse events among groups. Conclusion: Ciprofol is safe and effective for colonoscopy anesthesia across BMI groups, offering stable hemodynamics without prolonging recovery or increasing adverse events. CBW is a reliable dosing metric for overweight and obese patients.

Indexed as

Body Mass IndexColonoscopyAdultAgedAnesthesiaAnesthetics, IntravenousCyclopropanesDose-Response Relationship, DrugFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective Studies(2-(1R)-1-cyclopropyl)ethyl-6-isopropyl-phenolAnesthetics, IntravenousCyclopropanesanesthesiabody mass indexciprofolcolonoscopy

Identifiers

PMID39781446
PMCPMC11707850

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.