Observational studyAnnals of clinical and translational neurology2025
Interaction between riluzole treatment and dietary glycemic index in the disease progression of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.
Observational study in Annals of clinical and translational neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveWe examined whether riluzole treatment modifies the associations between the dietary glycemic index (GI) and load (GL) and disease progression in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS).
methodsSporadic ALS patients in the Multicenter Cohort Study of Oxidative Stress who completed a baseline food frequency questionnaire were included (n = 304). Interactions between baseline riluzole treatment and GI/GL on functional decline and tracheostomy-free survival were examined using linear regression and Cox proportional hazard models adjusted for covariates. Age, sex, disease duration, diagnostic certainty, body mass index, bulbar onset, revised ALS functional rating scale (ALSFRS-r) total score, and forced vital capacity, from baseline were included as covariates.
resultsBaseline higher GI and GL were associated with less decline of ALSFRS-r total score at 3-month follow-up in the riluzole treatment group (RTG) but not in the no-riluzole group (NRG). When quartile groups were used, GI second [β = -1.9, 95% CI (-4.1, -0.2), p = 0.07], third [β = -3.0, 95% CI (-5.1, -0.8), p < 0.01] and fourth [β = -2.2, 95% CI (-4.3, -0.01), p < 0.05] quartile groups were associated with less ALSFRS-r decline at 3-months compared to the first quartile group (GI < 47.2) among the RTG. Similarly, GL fourth quartile group (GL > 109.5) was associated with less ALSFRS-r decline at 3 months compared to the first quartile group [β = -2.6, 95% CI (-4.7, -0.5), p < 0.05] among the RTG. In NRG, no statistically significant differences in ALSFRS-r decline were found among GI/GL quartile groups.
interpretationHigh dietary GI and GL are associated with a slower functional decline only among ALS patients taking riluzole.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.