Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39783767›Full record

ArticleJournal of evaluation in clinical practice2025

What is a Good Outcome of an Inpatient Perinatal Mental Health Admission? Developing an Innovative Evaluation Plan for a New Unit.

Sophie Isobel, Alison Green, Sylvia Lim-Gibson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of evaluation in clinical practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sophie IsobelNaamuru Parent and Baby Unit, Sydney Local Health District, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1027-5847
Alison GreenNaamuru Parent and Baby Unit, Sydney Local Health District, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia.
Sylvia Lim-GibsonNaamuru Parent and Baby Unit, Sydney Local Health District, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleDeveloping a feasible and sensitive evaluation strategy for a new mental health service is a challenge that requires consideration of what a service is trying to achieve and what a 'good' outcome might look like. Perinatal mental illnesses are complex in their causes and treatment. Mother Baby Units provide specialist perinatal mental health care to parents experiencing mental illness in the perinatal period, with evaluations demonstrating clinical and social outcomes. There has however been remarkably little research on how MBUs achieve these outcomes.

methodThis paper outlines the process and components of designing an evaluation plan for a new perinatal mental health unit, summarising outcome measures considered and the methodology of the evaluation strategy.

resultsA meaningful realist approach was designed. This innovative dualistic methodology is intended to develop theories of what might cause change while also considering what components of interventions parents experience as meaningful.

conclusionArticulating the approach to evaluation provides a contribution to evaluation knowledge for others evaluating complex public health interventions. The relational nature of perinatal mental health experiences challenges individualistic approaches to care delivery, funding and evaluation. As part of service establishment, there is a need to consider what a 'good' outcome of care might be and to develop evaluation approaches that capture the relational components of recovery as well as the factors that support families to sustain change.

Indexed as

Mental DisordersFemaleHumansMental Health ServicesOutcome Assessment, Health CarePerinatal CarePregnancymeaningful evaluationmother baby unitperinatalrealist evaluation

Identifiers

PMID39783767
PMCPMC11713845

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.