ReviewPharmacology research & perspectives2025
An Updated Bio-Behavioral Profile of the Flinders Sensitive Line Rat: Reviewing the Findings of the Past Decade.
Review in Pharmacology research & perspectives, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Suanzao Ren Decoction Alleviates Anxiety-Like Behavior and Cognitive Dysfunction in Chronic Unpredictable Stress Rats by Modulating Oxidative Stress and Autophagy.Brain and behavior · 2026Article
- Early-life adversity induces metabolic alterations in a rodent model of depression: a differential stress response perspective.Acta neuropsychiatrica · 2026Article
- Fiber Distribution and Myelination of Dopaminergic Neurons in the Medial Forebrain Bundle of a Rodent Depression Model.Journal of neuroscience research · 2025Article
- Deep brain stimulation of medial forebrain bundle modulates noradrenergic activity and feedforward inhibition in rodent model of depression.Translational psychiatry · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Flinders sensitive line (FSL) rat is an accepted rodent model for depression that presents with strong face, construct, and predictive validity, thereby making it suitable to investigate novel antidepressant mechanisms. Despite the translatability of this model, available literature on this model has not been reviewed for more than ten years. The PubMed, ScienceDirect and Web of Science databases were searched for relevant articles between 2013 and 2024, with keywords relating to the Flinders line rat, and all findings relevant to treatment naïve animals, included. Following screening, 77 studies were included and used to create behavioral reference standards and calculate FSL favor ratios for the various behavioral parameters. The GRADE and SYRCLE risk of bias tools were used to scale the quality of these studies. Based on these results, FSL rats display reliable and reproducible depressive-like behavior in the forced swim test, together with hyperlocomotor activity across various behavioral tests. Despite reports of increased anhedonia, anxiety-like behavior, and cognitive dysfunction, the reviewed findings indicate that these parameters are comparable between strains. For the various neuro- and biological constructs, oxidative stress, energy production, and glutamatergic, noradrenergic and serotonergic neurotransmission received the most support for strain differences. Taken together, the FSL remains a reliable, popular, and translatable rodent model of depression, with strong face and construct validity. As for predictive validity, similar review approaches should be considered to establish whether the mentioned behavioral aspects and neurochemical constructs may be more sensitive (or resistant) to certain antidepressant strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.