Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39786312›Full record

ReviewPharmacology research & perspectives2025

An Updated Bio-Behavioral Profile of the Flinders Sensitive Line Rat: Reviewing the Findings of the Past Decade.

Stephan F Steyn

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pharmacology research & perspectives, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Stephan F SteynFaculty of Health Sciences, Centre of Excellence for Pharmaceutical Sciences, North-West University, Potchefstroom, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0023-9711

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Flinders sensitive line (FSL) rat is an accepted rodent model for depression that presents with strong face, construct, and predictive validity, thereby making it suitable to investigate novel antidepressant mechanisms. Despite the translatability of this model, available literature on this model has not been reviewed for more than ten years. The PubMed, ScienceDirect and Web of Science databases were searched for relevant articles between 2013 and 2024, with keywords relating to the Flinders line rat, and all findings relevant to treatment naïve animals, included. Following screening, 77 studies were included and used to create behavioral reference standards and calculate FSL favor ratios for the various behavioral parameters. The GRADE and SYRCLE risk of bias tools were used to scale the quality of these studies. Based on these results, FSL rats display reliable and reproducible depressive-like behavior in the forced swim test, together with hyperlocomotor activity across various behavioral tests. Despite reports of increased anhedonia, anxiety-like behavior, and cognitive dysfunction, the reviewed findings indicate that these parameters are comparable between strains. For the various neuro- and biological constructs, oxidative stress, energy production, and glutamatergic, noradrenergic and serotonergic neurotransmission received the most support for strain differences. Taken together, the FSL remains a reliable, popular, and translatable rodent model of depression, with strong face and construct validity. As for predictive validity, similar review approaches should be considered to establish whether the mentioned behavioral aspects and neurochemical constructs may be more sensitive (or resistant) to certain antidepressant strategies.

Indexed as

Behavior, AnimalDepressionDisease Models, AnimalAnimalsAntidepressive AgentsAnxietyOxidative StressRatsRats, Inbred StrainsAntidepressive Agentsbehaviorconstruct validityface validityforced swim test

Identifiers

PMID39786312
PMCPMC11717001

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.