Evidence mapPaperPMID 39786382Full record

ReviewJournal of behavioral addictions2025

Gaming disorder: Neural mechanisms and ongoing debates.

Yong-Bo Zheng, Sheng-Nan Zhang, Hua-Da Tang, San-Wang Wang, Xiao Lin, Yan-Ping Bao, Yu-Mei Wang, Mark D Griffiths, Jie Sun, Ying Han and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of behavioral addictions, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Yong-Bo Zheng1Peking University Sixth Hospital, Peking University Institute of Mental Health, NHC Key Laboratory of Mental Health (Peking University), National Clinical Research Center for Mental Disorders (Peking University Sixth Hospital), Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0002-5314-5364
Sheng-Nan Zhang3School of Nursing, Peking University, Beijing, China.ORCID 0009-0008-8543-1550
Hua-Da Tang4Peking University First Hospital, Peking University, Beijing, China.ORCID 0009-0002-5900-4551
San-Wang Wang1Peking University Sixth Hospital, Peking University Institute of Mental Health, NHC Key Laboratory of Mental Health (Peking University), National Clinical Research Center for Mental Disorders (Peking University Sixth Hospital), Beijing, China.ORCID 0009-0005-0488-3044
Xiao Lin1Peking University Sixth Hospital, Peking University Institute of Mental Health, NHC Key Laboratory of Mental Health (Peking University), National Clinical Research Center for Mental Disorders (Peking University Sixth Hospital), Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0002-0495-1220
Yan-Ping Bao6National Institute on Drug Dependence and Beijing Key Laboratory of Drug Dependence Research, Peking University, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0002-1881-0939
Yu-Mei Wang7Department of Psychology, Shandong Provincial Hospital affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, Shandong, China.ORCID 0009-0008-2802-780X
Mark D Griffiths8International Gaming Research Unit, Psychology Department, Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham NG1 4FQ, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8880-6524
Jie Sun9Pain Medicine Center, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0002-0702-9880
Ying Han6National Institute on Drug Dependence and Beijing Key Laboratory of Drug Dependence Research, Peking University, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0002-8381-4071
Lin Lu1Peking University Sixth Hospital, Peking University Institute of Mental Health, NHC Key Laboratory of Mental Health (Peking University), National Clinical Research Center for Mental Disorders (Peking University Sixth Hospital), Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0003-0742-9072

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and aims: The inclusion of gaming disorder as a new diagnosis in the 11th revision of the International Statistical Classification of Diseases (ICD-11) has caused ongoing debate. This review aimed to summarise the potential neural mechanisms of gaming disorder and provide additional evidence for this debate. Methods: We conducted a comprehensive literature review of gaming disorder, focusing on studies that investigated its clinical characteristics and neurobiological mechanisms. Based on this evidence, we further discuss gaming disorder as a psychiatric disorder. Results: The present review demonstrated that the brain regions involved in gaming disorder are related to executive functioning (e.g., anterior cingulate cortex and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex), reward systems (e.g., striatum and orbitofrontal cortex), and emotional regulation (e.g., insula and amygdala). Despite the inclusion of gaming disorder in the ICD-11, the debate remains on the benefits and harms of classifying it as a mental health disorder. Opponents argue that the current manifestations that support gaming disorder as a psychiatric disorder remain inadequate, it could cause moral panic among healthy gamers, and that the label of gaming disorder is stigmatising. Discussion: Evidence suggests that gaming disorder shares similar neurobiological alterations with other types of behavioural and substance-related addictions, which further supports gaming disorder as a behavioural addiction. Ongoing debates on whether gaming disorder is a psychiatric disorder push for further exploring the nature of gaming disorder and resolving this dilemma in the field.

Indexed as

BrainEmotional RegulationInternet Addiction DisorderVideo GamesExecutive FunctionHumansInternational Classification of DiseasesRewardbehavioural addictiongaming addictiongaming disorderneural mechanismsneurobiologyongoing debate

Identifiers

PMID39786382
PMCPMC11974403

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.