Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39786520›Full record

ArticleMolecular diversity2025

Elucidating the binding specificity of interactive compounds targeting ATP-binding cassette subfamily G member 2 (ABCG2).

Pawan Kumar, Indu Kumari, Rajendra Prasad, Shashikant Ray, Atanu Banerjee, Amresh Prakash

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular diversity, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Pawan Kumar *School of Computational and Integrative Sciences, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi, India.
Indu Kumari *Amity Institute of Biotechnology, Amity University Haryana, Gurugram, India.
Rajendra PrasadAmity Institute of Biotechnology, Amity University Haryana, Gurugram, India.
Shashikant RayDepartment of Biotechnology, Mahatma Gandhi Central University, Motihari, 845401, India.
Atanu BanerjeeAmity Institute of Biotechnology, Amity University Haryana, Gurugram, India. abanerjee1@ggn.amity.edu.
Amresh PrakashData Science, Amity Institute of Integrative Sciences and Health, Amity University Haryana, Gurugram, India. aprakash@ggn.amity.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ATP-binding cassette transporter superfamily plays a pivotal role in cellular detoxification and drug efflux. ATP-binding cassette subfamily G member 2 (ABCG2) referred to as the Breast cancer resistance protein has emerged as a key member involved in multidrug resistance displayed by cancer cells. Understanding the molecular basis of substrate and inhibitor recognition, and binding within the transmembrane domain of ABCG2 is crucial for the development of effective therapeutic strategies. Herein, utilizing state-of-the-art molecular docking algorithms and molecular dynamic (MD) simulations, molecular binding of substrates and inhibitors with ABCG2 are defined, distinctly. We performed extensive virtual screening of Drugbank to identify the potential candidates, and MD simulations of docked complexes were carried out in POPC lipid bilayer. Further, the binding affinities of compounds were estimated by free binding energy employing MM-GBSA. To gain deeper insight into the binding affinities and molecular characteristics contributing to inhibitory potential of certain substrates, we included some well-known inhibitors, like Imatinib, Tariquidar, and Ko 143, in our analysis. Docking results show three compounds, Docetaxel > Tariquidar > Tezacaftor having the highest binding affinities (≤ 12.00 kcal/mol) for ABCG2. Remarkably, MM-GBSA results suggest the most stable binding of Tariquidar with ABCG2 as compared to the other inhibitors. Furthermore, our results suggested that Docetaxel, Ozanimod, Pitavastatin, and Tezacaftor have the strongest affinity for the drug-binding site(s) of ABCG2. These results provide valuable insights into the key residues that may govern substrate/inhibitor recognition, shedding light on the molecular determinants influencing substrate specificity, transport kinetics, and ABCG2-mediated drug efflux.

Indexed as

ATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily G, Member 2Neoplasm ProteinsBinding SitesHumansMolecular Docking SimulationMolecular Dynamics SimulationProtein BindingABCG2 protein, humanATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily G, Member 2Neoplasm ProteinsABCG2/BCRPABC transporterInhibitorMD simulationsMolecular dockingMultidrug resistancePOPCSubstrateTariquidar

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.