Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39786689›Full record

ReviewCurrent treatment options in oncology2025

Central Nervous System Metastases in Breast Cancer.

Thomas Grinda, Ayal A Aizer, Nancy U Lin, Sarah L Sammons

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current treatment options in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Thomas GrindaBreast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Ayal A AizerHarvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Nancy U LinBreast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Sarah L SammonsBreast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. sarahl_sammons@dfci.harvard.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

opinion statementBreast cancer metastasizing to the central nervous system (CNS) encompasses two distinct entities: brain metastases involving the cerebral parenchyma and infiltration of the leptomeningeal space, i.e., leptomeningeal disease. CNS metastases affect 10-15% of patients with hormone receptor-positive-status and nearly one-half of those with HER2-positive and triple-negative breast cancer with distant metastatic disease. Significant clinical morbidity and heterogeneous penetration of the blood-brain barrier by systemic therapies contribute to the poor prognosis associated with brain metastases. Recent advances in radiotherapy, including stereotactic approaches and morbidity-reducing strategies such as the use of memantine and hippocampal avoidance in whole brain radiation, coupled with the development of more effective CNS-penetrant systemic therapies, including small molecules and antibody-drug conjugates, have significantly improved patient outcomes. Consequently, patients with breast cancer CNS metastases have improved survival compared to prior decades, and longitudinal care has become increasingly complex, necessitating a multidisciplinary approach to achieve optimal outcomes for patients.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsCentral Nervous System NeoplasmsBlood-Brain BarrierBrain NeoplasmsFemaleHumansImmunoconjugatesMemantineNeoplasm MetastasisImmunoconjugatesMemantineBrain metastasesBreast cancerCentral nervous systemLeptomeningeal disease

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.