Evidence mapPaperPMID 39788083Full record

ReviewNeuron2025

Astrocytes in aging.

Lara Labarta-Bajo, Nicola J Allen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neuron, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Stroke-induced gut microbiome dysbiosis accelerates Alzheimer's disease progression.Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Pinealectomy-Induced Neuroinflammation Varies with Age in Rats.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Lara Labarta-BajoSalk Institute for Biological Studies, Molecular Neurobiology Laboratory, 10010 North Torrey Pines Road, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA. Electronic address: llabartabajo@salk.edu.
Nicola J AllenSalk Institute for Biological Studies, Molecular Neurobiology Laboratory, 10010 North Torrey Pines Road, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA. Electronic address: nallen@salk.edu.

Funding

NIA NIH HHS R21 AG091117
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The mammalian nervous system is impacted by aging. Aging alters brain architecture, is associated with molecular damage, and can manifest with cognitive and motor deficits that diminish the quality of life. Astrocytes are glial cells of the CNS that regulate the development, function, and repair of neural circuits during development and adulthood; however, their functions in aging are less understood. Astrocytes change their transcriptome during aging, with astrocytes in areas such as the cerebellum, the hypothalamus, and white matter-rich regions being the most affected. While numerous studies describe astrocyte transcriptional changes in aging, many questions still remain. For example, how is astrocyte function altered by transcriptional changes that occur during aging? What are the mechanisms promoting astrocyte aged states? How do aged astrocytes impact brain function? This review discusses features of aged astrocytes and their potential triggers and proposes ways in which they may impact brain function and health span.

Indexed as

AgingAstrocytesBrainAnimalsHumansagingastrocytebrainCNSgliainflammation

Identifiers

PMID39788083
PMCPMC11735045

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.