Evidence mapPaperPMID 39788507Full record

ArticleZhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences2024

Machine learning-driven risk assessment of coronary heart disease: Analysis of NHANES data from 1999 to 2018.

Jin Lu, Haochang Hu, Jiaming Xiu, Yanfang Yang, Qifeng Zhu, Hanyi Dai, Xianbao Liu, Jian'an Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Zhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jin LuDepartment of Cardiology, Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310009. 12318327@zju.edu.cn.
Haochang HuDepartment of Cardiology, Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310009.
Jiaming XiuDepartment of Cardiology, Longyan First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Longyan Fujian 364000.
Yanfang YangDepartment of Cardiology, Provincial Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou 350001.
Qifeng ZhuDepartment of Cardiology, Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310009.
Hanyi DaiDepartment of Cardiology, Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310009.
Xianbao LiuDepartment of Cardiology, Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310009.
Jian'an WangDepartment of Cardiology, Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310009. wangjianan111@zju.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe high incidence of coronary artery heart disease (CHD) poses a significant burden and challenge to public health systems globally. Effective prevention and early diagnosis of CHD have become key strategies to alleviate this burden. This study aims to explore the application of advanced machine learning techniques to enhance the accuracy of early screening and risk assessment for CHD.

methodsA total of 49 490 study subjects from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) database spanning from 1999 to 2018 were included. The dataset was randomly divided into training (70%) and testing (30%) sets. The dependent variable (outcome variable) was whether the subjects were informed of a CHD diagnosis, categorizing them into a CHD group and a non-CHD group. We reviewed the literature on risk factors associated with CHD, ultimately including 68 independent variables. The variable characteristics of the study subjects were analyzed, comparing differences between the CHD and non-CHD groups. Machine learning algorithms, specifically random forest (randomForest_4.7-1.1) and XGBoost (xgboost_1.7.7.1) were utilized for variable selection. A comprehensive analysis of the top 10 variables identified by these 2 algorithms were conducted, selecting those mutually recognized by both. A generalized linear model was used to analyze the relationships between variables and CHD, and classical logistic regression was used to construct the CHD risk prediction model. The model's ability to distinguish between CHD and non-CHD individuals was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC); calibration measurements were conducted with the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test to evaluate the consistency between predicted values and actual CHD proportions; and decision curve analysis was applied to evaluate the clinical benefits of the model's risk prediction. Finally, a nomogram was constructed to visually present the risk scoring of the final model.

resultsThe mean age of the overall population was (49.53±18.31) years, with males comprising 51.8%. Compared to the non-CHD group, the CHD group was older [(69.05± 11.32) years vs (48.67±18.07) years,

conclusionsThis study successfully identified potential risk factors for CHD using machine learning techniques and developed a concise and practical clinical prediction model. Further prospective clinical cohort studies are needed to validate its potential for clinical application, enabling effective cardiovascular disease prevention and intervention strategies in real-world healthcare settings.

Indexed as

Coronary DiseaseMachine LearningNutrition SurveysAgedAlgorithmsCoronary Artery DiseaseFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsUnited Statescoronary artery heart diseasemachine learningNational Health and Nutrition Examination Surveyrisk assessmentrisk factors

Identifiers

PMID39788507
PMCPMC11628228

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.