Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39788557›Full record

SynthesisJournal of advanced nursing2025

Quality of Nursing Care: Addressing Sexuality as Part of Prostate Cancer Management, an Umbrella Review.

Catherine Neenan, Anna V Chatzi

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of advanced nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Catherine NeenanDepartment of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.
Anna V ChatziDepartment of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4089-577X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSexuality is a fundamental aspect of health and wellbeing. The management of prostate cancer can result in erectile dysfunction and body feminisation, resulting in loss of masculinity and alterations of body image. Prostate cancer patients identify sexuality as an unmet need and report little or no communication with their healthcare providers on the topic.

aimThis umbrella review aims to determine the barriers that may preclude nurses from discussing sexuality with prostate cancer patients.

designAn umbrella review of systematic review studies was undertaken using the PRISMA guidelines.

methodFive databases were comprehensively searched, CINAHL, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Cochrane and Prospero, from October 1, 2013 to December 1, 2023, using the defined criteria. A total of 11 systematic reviews were included in this review consisting of 10 with quantitative and 1 with quantitative/mixed methods approach.

resultsThis study identified common themes, which were categorised into four groups: (a) lack of training and education, (b) age and years of clinical experience of nurses, (c) personal values and attitudes and (d) organisational factors. These factors contribute to why nurses feel unprepared and admit to not having adequate knowledge or expertise to have this discussion.

conclusionThe findings of this study illustrate that nurses require specialised communication skills to manage sensitive discussion with patients. Education is crucial to facilitate and empower nurses to discuss sexuality with their patients. Developing a pathway to specialist referrals will encourage nurses to address this with their patients. NO PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: For the preparation of this paper, no direct involvement of patients or public has been deemed applicable to this work. This is an umbrella review paper.

Indexed as

Nurse-Patient RelationsNursing CareProstatic NeoplasmsQuality of Health CareSexualityAdultAgedAged, 80 and overHumansMaleMiddle Agedbarriersnursingprostate cancerquality caresexuality

Identifiers

PMID39788557
PMCPMC12271653

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.