ArticleBMJ open2025
Analysis of influencing factors of narrative medicine competence in the clinical nursing population in Hunan province, China: a cross-sectional study.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- A BOPPPS-structured narrative medicine intervention to enhance empathy and reduce ageism among undergraduate nursing students.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- The mediating effects of self-directed learning and nursing professional values on the relationship between digital literacy and narrative competence among nursing students: a cross-sectional study.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Factors associated with medical narrative competence of nurses: a qualitative study.Frontiers in health services · 2026Article
- A qualitative exploration of barriers to narrative nursing practice among early-career nurses.BMC nursing · 2025Article
- Current situation and influencing factors of clinical narrative competence of pediatric specialist nurses: a cross-sectional study.BMC nursing · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo explore the current status of clinical nurses' narrative medicine (NM) ability and its related influencing factors, so as to provide a theoretical basis for nursing managers to develop targeted nurse training programmes.
designA cross-sectional study.
settingA total of 1792 clinical nurses from eight medical institutions in Hunan province were selected as participants using convenience sampling.
main outcome measuresOnline questionnaires were employed to collect general data, NM competence scores, empathy ability scores and personality trait scores from the participants.
participantsA total of 1820 questionnaires were collected, with 28 deemed invalid due to contradictory responses. The final dataset included 1792 valid questionnaires, resulting in a valid recovery rate of 98.5%.
resultsThe total NM competence score averaged at 153.37±18.34. Marital status, having children, hospital grade, empathy ability score and challenges faced in carrying out NM were identified as influential factors through multiple linear regression (p<0.01). These factors collectively explained 71.9% of the total variation in the NM competence of clinical nurses.
conclusionClinical nurses in this study demonstrate an intermediate level of NM competence. Marital status, having children, hospital grade, empathy ability score and challenges in carrying out NM emerge as the primary factors affecting NM competence among nurses. The findings suggest that nursing managers should implement targeted measures to improve the NM competence of clinical nurses, thereby fostering their professional growth.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.