Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39789149›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Genetics2025

Epigenetics and individuality: from concepts to causality across timescales.

Amy K Webster, Patrick C Phillips

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Beyond Deterministic Fetal Programming: Intrauterine Exposures and the Multifactorial Origins of Adiposity.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Amy K WebsterInstitute of Ecology and Evolution, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4302-8102
Patrick C PhillipsInstitute of Ecology and Evolution, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR, USA. pphil@uoregon.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7271-342X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Traditionally, differences among individuals have been divided into genetic and environmental causes. However, both types of variation can underlie regulatory changes in gene expression - that is, epigenetic changes - that persist across cell divisions (developmental differentiation) and even across generations (transgenerational inheritance). Increasingly, epigenetic variation among individuals is recognized as an important factor in human diseases and ageing. Moreover, non-genetic inheritance can lead to evolutionary changes within populations that differ from those expected by genetic inheritance alone. Despite its importance, causally linking epigenetic variation to phenotypic differences across individuals has proven difficult, particularly when epigenetic variation operates independently of genetic variation. New genomic approaches are providing unprecedented opportunity to measure and perturb epigenetic variation, helping to elucidate the role of epigenetic variation in mediating the genotype-phenotype map. Here, we review studies that have advanced our understanding of how epigenetic variation contributes to phenotypic differences between individuals within and across generations, and provide a unifying framework that allows historical and mechanistic perspectives to more fully inform one another.

Indexed as

Epigenesis, GeneticGenetic VariationIndividualityAnimalsEpigenomicsHumansPhenotype

Identifiers

PMID39789149

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.