ArticleThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2025
Automated stenosis estimation of coronary angiographies using end-to-end learning.
Article in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- The current state of artificial intelligence-based invasive coronary angiography image analysis: a systematic review.European heart journal. Digital health · 2026Review
- Between hope and hype: assessing artificial intelligence in cardiovascular imaging.European heart journal. Imaging methods and practice · 2025Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The initial evaluation of stenosis during coronary angiography is typically performed by visual assessment. Visual assessment has limited accuracy compared to fractional flow reserve and quantitative coronary angiography, which are more time-consuming and costly. Applying deep learning might yield a faster and more accurate stenosis assessment. We developed a deep learning model to classify cine loops into left or right coronary artery (LCA/RCA) or "other". Data were obtained by manual annotation. Using these classifications, cine loops before revascularization were identified and curated automatically. Separate deep learning models for LCA and RCA were developed to estimate stenosis using these identified cine loops. From a cohort of 19,414 patients and 332,582 cine loops, we identified cine loops for 13,480 patients for model development and 5056 for internal testing. External testing was conducted using automated identified cine loops from 608 patients. For identification of significant stenosis (visual assessment of diameter stenosis > 70%), our model obtained a receiver operator characteristic (ROC) area under the curve (ROC-AUC) of 0.903 (95% CI: 0.900-0.906) on the internal test. The performance was evaluated on the external test set against visual assessment, 3D quantitative coronary angiography, and fractional flow reserve (≤ 0.80), obtaining ROC AUC values of 0.833 (95% CI: 0.814-0.852), 0.798 (95% CI: 0.741-0.842), and 0.780 (95% CI: 0.743-0.817), respectively. The deep-learning-based stenosis estimation models showed promising results for predicting stenosis. Compared to previous work, our approach demonstrates performance increase, includes all 16 segments, does not exclude revascularized patients, is externally tested, and is simpler using fewer steps.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.