ArticleSurgery today2025
Prognostic impact of subcutaneous fat quality and sarcopenia on the survival outcomes in patients with colorectal cancer.
Article in Surgery today, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Risk factors for postoperative complications after colorectal surgery in patients aged ≥ 80 years: A multicenter retrospective study.Surgery today · 2026Article
- Nonlinear Association Between Subcutaneous Fat Area and All-Cause Mortality in Postoperative Patients with Stage I-III Colorectal Cancer: A Multicenter Retrospective Study.Journal of gastrointestinal cancer · 2026Article
- Impact of an ERAS-Based Surgical Care Bundle Implementation for Preventing Anastomotic Leakage in Minimally Invasive Low Anterior Resection for Rectal Cancer: A Retrospective Cohort Study.World journal of surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis study aimed to evaluate the relationship between the quantity and quality of subcutaneous fat and prognosis following colorectal cancer resection.
methodWe conducted a retrospective analysis of the clinical data of 399 patients who underwent curative resection for stage 2 or 3 colorectal cancer between January 2013 and March 2019. This study examined the correlation between sarcopenia and various fat parameters, including fat area and density, and assessed their impact on the prognosis.
resultsSarcopenia was associated with a lower subcutaneous and visceral fat area, higher Hounsfield unit value in subcutaneous fat, and reduced modified intramuscular adipose tissue content in the multifidus, erector spinae, and psoas muscles. A low modified intramuscular adipose tissue content in the multifidus and erector spinae muscles was an independent prognostic factor for overall survival (hazard ratio, 2.28; p = 0.0329) and recurrence-free survival (hazard ratio: 2.32, p = 0.0233). Additionally, subcutaneous fat with a high Hounsfield unit was an independent predictor of a recurrence-free survival (hazard ratio, 2.68; p = 0.0142).
conclusionSubcutaneous fat quality is correlated with sarcopenia and it thus serves as a prognostic factor for recurrence after stage 2 or 3 colorectal cancer resection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39789347What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.