ArticleBMC pediatrics2025
The prediction model of academic achievement based on cardiorespiratory fitness and BMI status for ninth-grade students.
Article in BMC pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to predict an academic achievement model based on cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) and body mass index (BMI) in ninth-graders. The study sample included 6 530 adolescents from 341 public schools in Slovakia. Criterion-referenced competency tests measuring academic performance in mathematics and mother language (Slovak), CRF, and BMI were assessed in the academic year 2022-2023. The results from the Random Forest Regression (RFR) machine learning algorithm suggest that adolescents who meet the international CRF and BMI criterion-referenced standards have a higher probability of getting a higher academic achievement score than unfit students with overweight or obesity. The chances of achieving the highest level of academic performance rose by 165% in mathematics and by 484% in mother language for boys who were fit and of normal weight compared to unfit boys with obesity. Unfit boys with obesity and unfit overweight girls had significantly lower odds of having the highest level of academic achievement compared to fit and normal-weight adolescents in mathematics (OR = 0.38; 95% CI, 0.20-0.71; p = 0.003; OR = 0.32; 95% CI, 0.18-0.55; p < 0.001) and mother language, respectively (OR = 0.17; 95% CI, 0.09-0.34; p < 0.001; OR = 0.17; 95% CI, 0.08-0.38; p < 0.001). Our results suggest that CRF is a significant predictor, with fit and normal-weight boys showing higher odds of better academic performance, but the model's modest predictive power suggests other factors also play a role.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.