Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39789534›Full record

ReviewMicrobial cell factories2025

Engineering Saccharomyces cerevisiae for medical applications.

Carla Maneira, Alexandre Chamas, Gerald Lackner

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Microbial cell factories, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Enzyme promiscuity-driven co-production of flavonoid 7-Synthetic and systems biotechnology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Anti-QS Strategies AgainstMicroorganisms · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Carla ManeiraChair of Biochemistry of Microorganisms, Faculty of Life Sciences: Food, Nutrition and Health, University of Bayreuth, 95326, Kulmbach, Germany.
Alexandre ChamasDepartment of Microbial Pathogenicity Mechanisms, Leibniz Institute for Natural Product Research and Infection Biology, 07745, Jena, Germany.
Gerald LacknerChair of Biochemistry of Microorganisms, Faculty of Life Sciences: Food, Nutrition and Health, University of Bayreuth, 95326, Kulmbach, Germany. gerald.lackner@uni-bayreuth.de.

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft EXC 2051 - Project-ID 390713860
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDuring the last decades, the advancements in synthetic biology opened the doors for a profusion of cost-effective, fast, and ecologically friendly medical applications priorly unimaginable. Following the trend, the genetic engineering of the baker's yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, propelled its status from an instrumental ally in the food industry to a therapy and prophylaxis aid. MAIN TEXT: In this review, we scrutinize the main applications of engineered S. cerevisiae in the medical field focusing on its use as a cell factory for pharmaceuticals and vaccines, a biosensor for diagnostic and biomimetic assays, and as a live biotherapeutic product for the smart in situ treatment of intestinal ailments. An extensive view of these fields' academic and commercial developments as well as main hindrances is presented.

conclusionAlthough the field still faces challenges, the development of yeast-based medical applications is often considered a success story. The rapid advances in synthetic biology strongly support the case for a future where engineered yeasts play an important role in medicine.

Indexed as

Saccharomyces cerevisiaeSynthetic BiologyBiosensing TechniquesGenetic EngineeringHumansMetabolic EngineeringBiosensorCell factoryGenetic engineeringLive biotherapeutic productNatural productPharmaceuticalSynthetic biologyTherapeutic microbeVaccineYeast

Identifiers

PMID39789534
PMCPMC11720383

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.