ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2025
Prediction of urinary tract infection using machine learning methods: a study for finding the most-informative variables.
Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Research on biomarkers screening for urinary tract infection and the prediction model based on machine learning algorithms.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Article
- Large Models for Small Tables: Adapting Tabular Foundation Models to EHR Data.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2026Article
- Foundation Model-Guided Synthetic EHR Release: Performance Enhancement with Privacy Preservation.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2026Article
- Early detection of positive urine culture in patients with urolithiasis: a machine learning model with dynamic online nomogram.Annals of medicine · 2025Article
- Artificial Neural Network for the Fast Screening of Samples from Suspected Urinary Tract Infections.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Review of non-antibiotic treatment and prevention of recurrent UTIs - a summary of current guidance and suggested treatment algorithm.Therapeutic advances in infectious diseaseArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundUrinary tract infection (UTI) is a frequent health-threatening condition. Early reliable diagnosis of UTI helps to prevent misuse or overuse of antibiotics and hence prevent antibiotic resistance. The gold standard for UTI diagnosis is urine culture which is a time-consuming and also an error prone method. In this regard, complementary methods are demanded. In the recent decade, machine learning strategies that employ mathematical models on a dataset to extract the most informative hidden information are the center of interest for prediction and diagnosis purposes.
methodIn this study, machine learning approaches were used for finding the important variables for a reliable prediction of UTI. Several types of machines including classical and deep learning models were used for this purpose.
resultsEighteen selected features from urine test, blood test, and demographic data were found as the most informative features. Factors extracted from urine such as WBC, nitrite, leukocyte, clarity, color, blood, bilirubin, urobilinogen, and factors extracted from blood test like mean platelet volume, lymphocyte, glucose, red blood cell distribution width, and potassium, and demographic data such as age, gender and previous use of antibiotics were the determinative factors for UTI prediction. An ensemble combination of XGBoost, decision tree, and light gradient boosting machines with a voting scheme obtained the highest accuracy for UTI prediction (AUC: 88.53 (0.25), accuracy: 85.64 (0.20)%), according to the selected features. Furthermore, the results showed the importance of gender and age for UTI prediction.
conclusionThis study highlighted the potential of machine learning strategies for UTI prediction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.