ArticleGenome medicine2025
Clinical evaluation of long-read sequencing-based episignature detection in developmental disorders.
Article in Genome medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence and Genomic Data Analysis: New Frontiers in Precision Medicine.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Near-perfect genome sequencing in medical genetics.Nature genetics · 2026Review
- Long-read sequencing technologies and bioinformatics: a new perspective for decoding DNA methylation modifications.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Review
- Long-read genome sequencing improves detection and functional interpretation of structural and repeat variants in autism.Cell genomics · 2026Article
- To sign or not to sign: Is this still the question?European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2026Article
- Benchmarking RNA-seq Tools for Real-World Diagnostic Applications.Research square · 2026Article
- Functional and Epigenomic Consequences ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Long-read genome sequencing enhances diagnostics of pediatric neurological disorders.Genome medicine · 2026Article
- Integrating Long-Read Nanopore Sequencing for Precision Resolution of Genomic Variants in Dystonia.Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society · 2026Article
- Analysis Methods for Diagnosing Rare Neurodevelopmental Diseases with Episignatures: A Systematic Review of the Literature.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- A comprehensive long-read sequencing system to assess DNA methylation at differentially methylated regions and imprinting-disorder-related genes.Genome medicine · 2025Article
- Oxford Nanopore Technologies [ONT] Sequencing: Clinical Validation in Genetically Heterogeneous Disorders.Genes · 2025Article
- DNA methylation and machine learning: challenges and perspective toward enhanced clinical diagnostics.Clinical epigenetics · 2025Review
- Clinical utility of DNA-methylation signatures in routine diagnostics for neurodevelopmental disorders.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2025Article
- Review
- Toward clinical long-read genome sequencing for rare diseases.Nature genetics · 2025Review
- The impact of long-read sequencing on human population-scale genomics.Genome research · 2025Review
- Long read sequencing enhances pathogenic and novel variation discovery in patients with rare diseases.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Clinical evaluation of long-read sequencing-based episignature detection in developmental disorders.Genome medicine · 2025Article
- Nanopore sequencing enables combined detection ofFrontiers in genetics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundA subset of developmental disorders (DD) is characterized by disease-specific genome-wide methylation changes. These episignatures inform on the underlying pathogenic mechanisms and can be used to assess the pathogenicity of genomic variants as well as confirm clinical diagnoses. Currently, the detection of these episignature requires the use of indirect methylation profiling methodologies. We hypothesized that long-read whole genome sequencing would not only enable the detection of single nucleotide variants and structural variants but also episignatures.
methodsGenome-wide nanopore sequencing was performed in 40 controls and 20 patients with confirmed or suspected episignature-associated DD, representing 13 distinct diseases. Following genomic variant and methylome calling, hierarchical clustering and dimensional reduction were used to determine the compatibility with microarray-based episignatures. Subsequently, we developed a support vector machine (SVM) for the detection of each DD.
resultsNanopore sequencing-based methylome patterns were concordant with microarray-based episignatures. Our SVM-based classifier identified the episignatures in 17/19 patients with a (likely) pathogenic variant and none of the controls. The remaining patients in which no episignature was identified were also classified as controls by a commercial microarray assay. In addition, we identified all underlying pathogenic single nucleotide and structural variants and showed haplotype-aware skewed X-inactivation evaluation directs clinical interpretation.
conclusionThis proof-of-concept study demonstrates nanopore sequencing enables episignature detection. In addition, concurrent haplotyped genomic and epigenomic analyses leverage simultaneous detection of single nucleotide/structural variants, X-inactivation, and imprinting, consolidating a multi-step sequential process into a single diagnostic assay.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.