Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39789644›Full record

ArticleGenome medicine2025

Clinical evaluation of long-read sequencing-based episignature detection in developmental disorders.

Mathilde Geysens, Benjamin Huremagic, Erika Souche, Jeroen Breckpot, Koenraad Devriendt, Hilde Peeters, Griet Van Buggenhout, Hilde Van Esch, Kris Van Den Bogaert, Joris Robert Vermeesch

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. To sign or not to sign: Is this still the question?European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Functional and Epigenomic Consequences ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Integrating Long-Read Nanopore Sequencing for Precision Resolution of Genomic Variants in Dystonia.Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society · 2026
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Mathilde Geysens *Laboratory of Cytogenetics and Genome Research, Centre for Human Genetics, KU Leuven, Leuven, 3000, Belgium.
Benjamin Huremagic *Laboratory of Cytogenetics and Genome Research, Centre for Human Genetics, KU Leuven, Leuven, 3000, Belgium.
Erika SoucheLaboratory of Cytogenetics and Genome Research, Centre for Human Genetics, KU Leuven, Leuven, 3000, Belgium.
Jeroen BreckpotDepartment of Human Genetics, Centre for Human Genetics, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, 3000, Belgium.
Koenraad DevriendtDepartment of Human Genetics, Centre for Human Genetics, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, 3000, Belgium.
Hilde PeetersDepartment of Human Genetics, Centre for Human Genetics, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, 3000, Belgium.
Griet Van BuggenhoutDepartment of Human Genetics, Centre for Human Genetics, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, 3000, Belgium.
Hilde Van EschDepartment of Human Genetics, Centre for Human Genetics, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, 3000, Belgium.
Kris Van Den BogaertLaboratory of Cytogenetics and Genome Research, Centre for Human Genetics, KU Leuven, Leuven, 3000, Belgium.
Joris Robert VermeeschLaboratory of Cytogenetics and Genome Research, Centre for Human Genetics, KU Leuven, Leuven, 3000, Belgium. joris.vermeesch@kuleuven.be.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA subset of developmental disorders (DD) is characterized by disease-specific genome-wide methylation changes. These episignatures inform on the underlying pathogenic mechanisms and can be used to assess the pathogenicity of genomic variants as well as confirm clinical diagnoses. Currently, the detection of these episignature requires the use of indirect methylation profiling methodologies. We hypothesized that long-read whole genome sequencing would not only enable the detection of single nucleotide variants and structural variants but also episignatures.

methodsGenome-wide nanopore sequencing was performed in 40 controls and 20 patients with confirmed or suspected episignature-associated DD, representing 13 distinct diseases. Following genomic variant and methylome calling, hierarchical clustering and dimensional reduction were used to determine the compatibility with microarray-based episignatures. Subsequently, we developed a support vector machine (SVM) for the detection of each DD.

resultsNanopore sequencing-based methylome patterns were concordant with microarray-based episignatures. Our SVM-based classifier identified the episignatures in 17/19 patients with a (likely) pathogenic variant and none of the controls. The remaining patients in which no episignature was identified were also classified as controls by a commercial microarray assay. In addition, we identified all underlying pathogenic single nucleotide and structural variants and showed haplotype-aware skewed X-inactivation evaluation directs clinical interpretation.

conclusionThis proof-of-concept study demonstrates nanopore sequencing enables episignature detection. In addition, concurrent haplotyped genomic and epigenomic analyses leverage simultaneous detection of single nucleotide/structural variants, X-inactivation, and imprinting, consolidating a multi-step sequential process into a single diagnostic assay.

Indexed as

Developmental DisabilitiesDNA MethylationChildFemaleHumansMaleNanopore SequencingPolymorphism, Single NucleotideSupport Vector MachineWhole Genome SequencingDevelopmental disordersEpisignaturesLong-read sequencingMethylationMethylomeNanopore sequencingSupport vector machineX-inactivation

Identifiers

PMID39789644
PMCPMC11721592

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.