Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39789751›Full record

ArticleThe plant genome2025

Within-family genomic selection in strawberry: Optimization of marker density, trial design, and training set composition.

Joshua Sleper, Ronald Tapia, Seonghee Lee, Vance Whitaker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The plant genome, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Joshua SleperPlant Breeding Graduate Program, Horticultural Sciences Department, University of Florida, IFAS Gulf Coast Research and Education Center, Wimauma, Florida, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-0222-996X
Ronald TapiaHorticultural Sciences Department, IFAS Citrus Research and Education Center, University of Florida, Lake Alfred, Florida, USA.
Seonghee LeePlant Breeding Graduate Program, Horticultural Sciences Department, University of Florida, IFAS Gulf Coast Research and Education Center, Wimauma, Florida, USA.
Vance WhitakerPlant Breeding Graduate Program, Horticultural Sciences Department, University of Florida, IFAS Gulf Coast Research and Education Center, Wimauma, Florida, USA.

Funding

Florida Strawberry Research and Education FoundationUSDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture (NIFA) Specialty Crops Research Initiative Award 2017-51181-26833USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture (NIFA) Specialty Crops Research Initiative Award 2022-51181-38328
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genomic selection is a widely used quantitative method of determining the genetic value of an individual from genomic information and phenotypic data. In this study, we used a large, multi-year training population of 3248 individuals from the University of Florida strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa Duchesne) breeding program. We coupled this training population with a test population of 1460 individuals derived from 20 biparental families. Using these two populations, we tested different genomic selection methods of predicting each family separately for the purpose of within-family selection of seedlings for multiple yield-related traits in strawberry. The methodology we considered were comprised of 11 different marker densities, 10 different training set sizes, four different training set composition techniques, and one to five clonal replications for each individual in the training population. We demonstrated that prediction accuracy varied among the 20 biparental families from 0.05 to 0.63 for the three traits investigated. We also showed that a medium-density genotyping strategy (1500-1650 single nucleotide polymorphisms) could be 95%-97% as effective as a high-density genotyping platform and that imputation to the more dense platform always improved accuracy. Training set composition techniques had no discernible effect on prediction accuracy. However, increasing training set size improved prediction accuracy, and accuracy did not plateau even when training sets exceeded 3000 individuals. Finally, we showed that the number of clonal replicates in field trials could be reduced by 80% without any negative effects on genomic selection accuracy.

Indexed as

FragariaGenome, PlantPlant BreedingSelection, GeneticGenetic MarkersGenomicsGenotypePhenotypePolymorphism, Single NucleotideGenetic Markers

Identifiers

PMID39789751
PMCPMC11718141

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.