ArticleThe plant genome2025
Within-family genomic selection in strawberry: Optimization of marker density, trial design, and training set composition.
Article in The plant genome, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- From family trials to genomic mate allocation: statistical and genomic strategies to accelerate sugarcane genetic improvement.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2026Review
- Scalable medium-density genotyping platforms for cultivar identification, pedigree authentication, marker-assisted and genomic selection, and other applications in strawberry.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2026Article
- Integrating genomic selection into potato breeding: A comparison of genotyping platforms and cross-environmental predictions.The plant genome · 2026Article
- Genomic prediction of wild-derived powdery mildew resistance for strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa) pre-breeding.Heredity · 2026Article
- Using genomic selection to examine subgenome dominance and epistasis in allopolyploid strawberry.The plant genome · 2026Article
- Modeling production curves in a strawberry breeding program to optimize early season productivity.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- Article
- Exploring the efficacy of phenomic and genomic selection for yield and fruit quality traits in strawberry.The plant genome · 2025Article
- Integrative Machine Learning Approaches for Identifying Loci Associated with Anthracnose Resistance in Strawberry.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Within-family genomic selection in strawberry: Optimization of marker density, trial design, and training set composition.The plant genome · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Genomic selection is a widely used quantitative method of determining the genetic value of an individual from genomic information and phenotypic data. In this study, we used a large, multi-year training population of 3248 individuals from the University of Florida strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa Duchesne) breeding program. We coupled this training population with a test population of 1460 individuals derived from 20 biparental families. Using these two populations, we tested different genomic selection methods of predicting each family separately for the purpose of within-family selection of seedlings for multiple yield-related traits in strawberry. The methodology we considered were comprised of 11 different marker densities, 10 different training set sizes, four different training set composition techniques, and one to five clonal replications for each individual in the training population. We demonstrated that prediction accuracy varied among the 20 biparental families from 0.05 to 0.63 for the three traits investigated. We also showed that a medium-density genotyping strategy (1500-1650 single nucleotide polymorphisms) could be 95%-97% as effective as a high-density genotyping platform and that imputation to the more dense platform always improved accuracy. Training set composition techniques had no discernible effect on prediction accuracy. However, increasing training set size improved prediction accuracy, and accuracy did not plateau even when training sets exceeded 3000 individuals. Finally, we showed that the number of clonal replicates in field trials could be reduced by 80% without any negative effects on genomic selection accuracy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.