ArticleGenetics2025
High-recombining genomic regions affect demography inference based on ancestral recombination graphs.
Article in Genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Severe bottleneck of ancient Homo populations: insights from computational modeling and relevant fossil evidence.Molecular biology and evolution · 2026Article
- Shifting Balancing Selection Underlies an Inversion Cline in Eurasian Blackcap.Ecology and evolution · 2026Article
- AI solutions for evolutionary genomics of nonmodel species.Evolution letters · 2026Review
- Genomic perspectives on the inference of evolutionary changes in ecological life-history traits.Quantitative plant biology · 2026Review
- Comparative Analyses of Four Reference Genomes Reveal Exceptional Diversity and Weak Linked Selection in the Yellow Monkeyflower (Mimulus guttatus) Complex.Molecular ecology resources · 2025Article
- Benchmarking and optimization of methods for the detection of identity-by-descent in high-recombiningeLife · 2025Article
- Resolving out of Africa event for Papua New Guinean population using neural network.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Biases in ARG-Based Inference of Historical Population Size in Populations Experiencing Selection.Molecular biology and evolution · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Multiple methods of demography inference are based on the ancestral recombination graph. This powerful approach uses observed mutations to model local genealogies changing along chromosomes by historical recombination events. However, inference of underlying genealogies is difficult in regions with high recombination rate relative to mutation rate due to the lack of mutations representing genealogies. Despite the prevalence of high-recombining genomic regions in some organisms, such as birds, its impact on demography inference based on ancestral recombination graphs has not been well studied. Here, we use population genomic simulations to investigate the impact of high-recombining regions on demography inference based on ancestral recombination graphs. We demonstrate that inference of effective population size and the time of population split events is systematically affected when high-recombining regions cover wide breadths of the chromosomes. Excluding high-recombining genomic regions can practically mitigate this impact, and population genomic inference of recombination maps is informative in defining such regions although the estimated values of local recombination rate can be biased. Finally, we confirm the relevance of our findings in empirical analysis by contrasting demography inferences applied for a bird species, the Eurasian blackcap (Sylvia atricapilla), using different parts of the genome with high and low recombination rates. Our results suggest that demography inference methods based on ancestral recombination graphs should be carried out with caution when applied in species whose genomes contain long stretches of high-recombining regions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.