ReviewCardiovascular diagnosis and therapy2024
Impact of cardiovascular magnetic resonance in single ventricle physiology: a narrative review.
Review in Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Combined CMR and catheterization for pre-Fontan evaluation: comparing metrics and clinical correlations.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic ResonanceArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Objective: Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) is a routine cross-sectional imaging modality in adults with congenital heart disease. Developing CMR techniques and the knowledge that CMR is well suited to assess long-term complications and to provide prognostic information for single ventricle (SV) patients makes CMR the ideal assessment tool for this patient cohort. Nevertheless, many of the techniques have not yet been incorporated into day-to-day practice. The aim of this review is to provide a comprehensive overview of CMR applications in SV patients together with recent scientific findings. Methods: Articles from 2009 to August 2024 retrieved from PubMed on CMR in SV patients were included. Case reports and non-English literature were excluded. Key Content and Findings: CMR is essential for serial follow-up of SV patients and CMR-derived standard markers can improve patient management and prognosis assessment. Advanced CMR techniques likely will enhance our understanding of Fontan hemodynamics and are promising tools for a comprehensive patient evaluation and care. Conclusions: There is increasing research that shows the advantages of CMR in Fontan patients. However, further research about the prognostic role of CMR in older Fontan patients and how new methods such as modeling and deep learning pipelines can be clinically implemented is warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.