ArticleIEEE transactions on medical robotics and bionics2024
Magnetic Ball Chain Robots for Cardiac Arrhythmia Treatment.
Article in IEEE transactions on medical robotics and bionics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Closed-loop Control of Steerable Balloon Endoscopes for Robot-assisted Transcatheter Intracardiac Procedures.IEEE robotics and automation letters · 2026Article
- Investigating workload and usability of remote magnetic navigation for catheter ablation.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2026Article
- Advanced Robotics for the Next-Generation of Cardiac Interventions.Micromachines · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This paper introduces a novel magnetic navigation system for cardiac ablation. The system is formed from two key elements: a magnetic ablation catheter consisting of a chain of spherical permanent magnets; and an actuation system comprised of two cart-mounted permanent magnets undergoing pure rotation. The catheter design enables a large magnetic content with the goal of minimizing the footprint of the actuation system for easier integration with the clinical workflow. We present a quasi-static model of the catheter, the design of the actuation units, and their control modalities. Experimental validation shows that we can use small rotating magnets (119mm diameter) to reach cardiac ablation targets while generating clinically-relevant forces. Catheter control using a joystick is compared with manual catheter control. While total task completion time is similar, smoother navigation is observed using the proposed robotic system. We also demonstrate that the ball chain can ablate heart tissue and generate lesions comparable to the current clinical ablation catheters.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.