ArticleAlzheimer's & dementia (New York, N. Y.)
Evaluation of efficiency and effectiveness of different recruitment strategies for the FINGER-NL multidomain lifestyle intervention trial via the Dutch Brain Research Registry.
Article in Alzheimer's & dementia (New York, N. Y.). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Gender-related facilitators and barriers to participation in research on aging using fuzzy cognitive mapping.Neurobiology of aging · 2026Article
- Barriers and facilitators to recruitment, engagement, and retention of underrepresented populations in dementia prevention research: a scoping review.The journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease · 2026Article
- Modernizing diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease: A review of global trends and Asia-specific perspectives.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025Review
- Exploring Older Adults' Pre-Intervention Motivations, Attitudes, Expectations, and Barriers to Participation in the FINGER-NL Lifestyle Intervention to Maintain Optimal Cognitive Functioning: A Qualitative Interview Study.Ageing international · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionRecruitment of participants for intervention studies is challenging. We evaluated the effectiveness and efficiency of a participant recruitment campaign through an online registry for the FINGER-NL study, a multi-domain lifestyle intervention trial targeting cognitively healthy individuals aged 60-79 with dementia prevention potential. Additionally, we explored which recruitment strategy successfully reached individuals from underrepresented groups in research.
methodsThe campaign entailed seven recruitment strategies referring to The Dutch Brain Research Registry (DBRR): (1) Facebook advertisements, (2) appearance on national television, (3) newspaper articles, (4) researcher outreach, (5) patient organizations, (6) search engines, and (7) other. For each strategy, we describe the number of individuals (a) registered, (b) potentially eligible, and (c) included in FINGER-NL. Subsequently, the efficiency, defined by the eligibility ratio (eligible/registered), and effectiveness, defined by the inclusion ratio (included/registered) were calculated. Associations between recruitment strategies and sociodemographic factors of underrepresented groups were tested with binomial logistic regressions.
resultsThe campaign resulted in 13,795 new DBRR registrants, of which DISCUSSION: A multipronged recruitment campaign via a national online recruitment registry is efficient and effective in recruiting and prescreening an adequate number of individuals aged 60-79 years with prevention potential for a multi-site intervention trial within a limited time frame of 15 months. Social media advertisements and television are preferred strategies to recruit individuals from underrepresented groups. Highlights: An online brain research registry recruited eligible participants successfully.Mass media recruitment strategies are efficient for reaching large numbers.Direct recruitment through researchers and patient organizations seems more effective.Online registries offer automated prescreening and alternatives for screen-failures.Tailored strategies are needed to reach underrepresented groups to improve diversity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.