ArticleJournal of the American Heart Association2025
Sex Differences in the Association Between Cardiovascular Autonomic Neuropathy and Mortality in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: The ACCORD Study.
Article in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dim light at night worsens cardiac autonomic dysregulation in female diabetic mice.Heart rhythm · 2026Article
- Sex Differences in Cardiovascular Risk and Diabetic Polyneuropathy: A Single-Center Retrospective Study in North-Eastern Hungary.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Sex differences in 10-year cardiovascular risk of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and subclinical hypothyroidism: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCardiovascular autonomic neuropathy (CAN) is a severe complication of type 2 diabetes. Significant sex-related differences have been observed in type 2 diabetes consequences such as mortality. However, the effect of sex on the association between CAN and mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes is currently unknown. METHODS AND
resultsWe assessed 7866 participants in the ACCORD (Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes) trial, including 4730 men and 3136 women. CAN was diagnosed using a combination of heart rate variability and QT interval index, which has 3 different definitions. There were 1364 cases of all-cause mortality and 452 cases of cardiovascular disease mortality during a median follow-up of 9.7 years. We used multivariable Cox regression models to assess the association between different CAN definitions and mortality. In women, various CAN measures were statistically significant associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality (CAN1: hazard ratio [HR], 1.64 [95% CI, 1.28-2.09]; CAN2: HR, 1.58 [95% CI, 1.17-2.15]; CAN3: HR, 1.78 [95% CI, 1.20-2.65]) and mortality (CAN1: HR, 2.25 [95% CI, 1.44-3.52]; CAN 2: HR, 2.22 [95% CI, 1.28-3.87]; CAN3: HR, 3.31 [95% CI, 1.67-6.57]). CAN was not significantly associated with mortality in men. A significant multiplicative interaction of CAN and sex was observed on both mortality outcomes (
conclusionsSignificant sex-related differences were observed in CAN and its associated mortality. In terms of mortality risk prevention, CAN should be given greater consideration in women with type 2 diabetes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.