ReviewHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2024
The Family Doctor in the "COVID-19 Era".
Review in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The SARS-CoV-2 virus infection, the most severe pandemic in recent human history, found healthcare systems around the world more or less unprepared. Adjusting to this challenge involved changes in the daily routines of healthcare systems, as well as the patients, once again highlighting the importance of primary care (family physician or general practitioner). In the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, the family doctor in Romania played a crucial role in patient management, rapidly adapting to the changes and challenges imposed by the state of emergency. Their involvement quickly evolved from in-person consultations to online assessments, as they took on responsibilities such as monitoring patients in isolation or quarantine and issuing necessary medical leaves. Moreover, family doctors were directly involved in the COVID-19 vaccination process, facing challenges related to access to scheduling platforms and limited resources of protective equipment. Although they were on the front line of the healthcare response, recognition through incentives or compensations came late and incompletely, and their efforts in combating the pandemic were often overlooked. Designating family doctors' offices as public utility medical units (regardless of their organisational form) and supporting their activities through increased equipment and medical devices provided by local or central authorities are the keys to fighting for human lives in critical situations. Implementing clear and universal rules regarding the competencies (skills) and duties of family doctors, both in normal life situations and in exceptional circumstances, is of utmost importance. Little is known about the dedicated work and dedication of family physicians to their patients. Few studies have been carried out on the activity of the family doctor and their professional difficulties during the pandemic period. Some studies, on a small number of subjects, tried to evaluate the psychological adaptation of the family doctor to the new epidemiological situation. The aim of this narrative review is to highlight the difficulties to which family doctors had to adapt, comparing the data from the Romanian medical system with those discovered in the medical literature regarding family doctors from all over the world.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.