Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39792163›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2025

Deep learning-based image domain reconstruction enhances image quality and pulmonary nodule detection in ultralow-dose CT with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-V.

Kai Ye, Libo Xu, Boyang Pan, Jie Li, Meijiao Li, Huishu Yuan, Nan-Jie Gong

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Kai Ye *Department of Radiology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Libo Xu *Laboratory for Intelligent Medical Imaging, Tsinghua Cross-strait Research Institute, Xiamen, China.
Boyang PanRadioDynamic Medical, Shanghai, China.
Jie LiDepartment of Radiology, Clinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
Meijiao LiDepartment of Radiology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Huishu YuanDepartment of Radiology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China. huishy@bjmu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5320-4360
Nan-Jie GongShanghai Key Laboratory of Magnetic Resonance, School of Physics and Electronic Science, East China Normal University, Shanghai, China. nanjie.gong@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9249-413X

Funding

Beijing Natural Science Foundation 7212126Beijing New Health Industry Development Foundation XM2020-02-006National Natural Science Foundation of China 82171927Xiamen Natural Science Foundation 3502Z202373090
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo evaluate the image quality and lung nodule detectability of ultralow-dose CT (ULDCT) with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-V (ASiR-V) post-processed using a deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR)-based image domain compared to low-dose CT (LDCT) and ULDCT without DLIR. MATERIALS AND

methodsA total of 210 patients undergoing lung cancer screening underwent LDCT (mean ± SD, 0.81 ± 0.28 mSv) and ULDCT (0.17 ± 0.03 mSv) scans. ULDCT images were reconstructed with ASiR-V (ULDCT-ASiR-V) and post-processed using DLIR (ULDCT-DLIR). The quality of the three CT images was analyzed. Three radiologists detected and measured pulmonary nodules on all CT images, with LDCT results serving as references. Nodule conspicuity was assessed using a five-point Likert scale, followed by further statistical analyses.

resultsA total of 463 nodules were detected using LDCT. The image noise of ULDCT-DLIR decreased by 60% compared to that of ULDCT-ASiR-V and was lower than that of LDCT (p < 0.001). The subjective image quality scores for ULDCT-DLIR (4.4 [4.1, 4.6]) were also higher than those for ULDCT-ASiR-V (3.6 [3.1, 3.9]) (p < 0.001). The overall nodule detection rates for ULDCT-ASiR-V and ULDCT-DLIR were 82.1% (380/463) and 87.0% (403/463), respectively (p < 0.001). The percentage difference between diameters > 1 mm was 2.9% (ULDCT-ASiR-V vs. LDCT) and 0.5% (ULDCT-DLIR vs. LDCT) (p = 0.009). Scores of nodule imaging sharpness on ULDCT-DLIR (4.0 ± 0.68) were significantly higher than those on ULDCT-ASiR-V (3.2 ± 0.50) (p < 0.001).

conclusionDLIR-based image domain improves image quality, nodule detection rate, nodule imaging sharpness, and nodule measurement accuracy of ASiR-V on ULDCT. KEY POINTS: Question Deep learning post-processing is simple and cheap compared with raw data processing, but its performance is not clear on ultralow-dose CT. Findings Deep learning post-processing enhanced image quality and improved the nodule detection rate and accuracy of nodule measurement of ultralow-dose CT. Clinical relevance Deep learning post-processing improves the practicability of ultralow-dose CT and makes it possible for patients with less radiation exposure during lung cancer screening.

Indexed as

Deep LearningImage Processing, Computer-AssistedLung NeoplasmsMultiple Pulmonary NodulesRadiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedSolitary Pulmonary NoduleTomography, X-Ray ComputedAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRadiation DosageRetrospective StudiesDeep learningImage processingLung cancerPulmonary noduleTomography (X-ray computed)

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.