ArticleUpdates in surgery2025
Preoperative hemoglobin to albumin ratio as a prognostic predictor for patients with colorectal cancer surgery.
Article in Updates in surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- The prognostic value of hemoglobin-to-albumin ratio in critically ill patients with atrial fibrillation: A retrospective cohort study.Medicine · 2026Article
- Neutrophil Albumin Ratio, Platelet Albumin Ratio, and Certain Inflammatory Parameters in Acne Vulgaris.Dermatology practical & conceptual · 2026Article
- Construction of a novel prediction model based on albumin-hemoglobin score and serum microRNA-497-5p for prognosis of patients with stage II-III colorectal cancer.Oncology letters · 2026Article
- Comment on: "Preoperative hemoglobin to albumin ratio as a prognostic predictor for patients with colorectal cancer surgery".Updates in surgery · 2025Article
- Correlation between hemoglobin-to-albumin ratio and complications after radical gastrectomy in gastric cancer patients.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to identify whether the preoperative hemoglobin to albumin ratio (HAR) could predict the prognosis of patients who underwent colorectal cancer (CRC) radical resection. This study enrolled 4018 consecutive CRC patients, calculating HAR as the hemoglobin count divided by albumin count. Patients were divided into the high and low HAR groups based on a cut-off value (0.36). Baseline information and short-term outcomes were compared between the two groups. Logistic and Cox regression analyses were conducted to determine whether HAR was an independent risk factor for CRC. A total of 4018 patients were divided into the high HAR group (3295) and the low HAR group (723). It was found that the high HAR group had more females (P < 0.01), less BMI (P = 0.027), less smoking (P < 0.01), less drinking (P < 0.01), less T2DM (P = 0.027), lower albumin (P < 0.01), higher hemoglobin (P < 0.01) and more rectal cancer (P = 0.026). We found that HAR was an independent risk factor for overall complications (P = 0.012, OR = 1.279, 95% CI 1.055-1.550). Moreover, we found that HAR was an independent risk factor for overall survival (OS) (P = 0.012, HR = 1.300, 95% CI 1.059-1.597) and disease-free survival (DFS) (P = 0.030, HR = 1.231, 95% CI 1.021-1.484). We found that the low HAR group had worse OS in stage III (P = 0.012) CRC than the high HAR group. In terms of DFS, the low HAR group also had worse DFS in stage III (P = 0.01) CRC than the high HAR group. HAR was an independent predictive factor for the prognosis of CRC. Therefore, surgeons should pay attention to hemoglobin and albumin values before surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39792231What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.