Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39793083›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2025

Learning the language of antibody hypervariability.

Rohit Singh, Chiho Im, Yu Qiu, Brian Mackness, Abhinav Gupta, Taylor Joren, Samuel Sledzieski, Lena Erlach, Maria Wendt, Yves Fomekong Nanfack and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Learning the language of protein-protein interactions.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. SResearch (Washington, D.C.) · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Rohit Singh *Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139.
Chiho Im *Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139.
Yu QiuSanofi R&D Large Molecule Research, Cambridge, MA 02141.
Brian MacknessSanofi R&D Large Molecule Research, Cambridge, MA 02141.
Abhinav GuptaSanofi R&D Large Molecule Research, Cambridge, MA 02141.
Taylor JorenSanofi R&D Data and Data Science, Artificial Intelligence and Deep Analytics, Cambridge, MA 02141.
Samuel SledzieskiComputer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139.ORCID 0000-0002-0170-3029
Lena ErlachDepartment of Biosystems Science and Engineering, ETH Zürich, 8092, Switzerland.
Maria WendtSanofi R&D Large Molecule Research, Cambridge, MA 02141.
Yves Fomekong NanfackSanofi R&D Large Molecule Research, Cambridge, MA 02141.
Bryan BrysonDepartment of Biological Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139.ORCID 0000-0003-1716-6712
Bonnie BergerComputer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139.

Funding

Manifold representations and active learning for 21 st century biologyR35GM141861 · NIGMS · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI BERGER, BONNIE · 2021 to 2025
$1.9M
HHS | NIH | National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS) 1R35GM141861NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM141861Sanofi (Sanofi US) 2022 iDEA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Protein language models (PLMs) have demonstrated impressive success in modeling proteins. However, general-purpose "foundational" PLMs have limited performance in modeling antibodies due to the latter's hypervariable regions, which do not conform to the evolutionary conservation principles that such models rely on. In this study, we propose a transfer learning framework called Antibody Mutagenesis-Augmented Processing (AbMAP), which fine-tunes foundational models for antibody-sequence inputs by supervising on antibody structure and binding specificity examples. Our learned feature representations accurately predict mutational effects on antigen binding, paratope identification, and other key antibody properties. We experimentally validate AbMAP for antibody optimization by applying it to refine a set of antibodies that bind to a SARS-CoV-2 peptide, and obtain an 82% hit-rate and up to 22-fold increase in binding affinity. AbMAP also unlocks large-scale analyses of immune repertoires, revealing that B-cell receptor repertoires of individuals, while remarkably different in sequence, converge toward similar structural and functional coverage. Importantly, AbMAP's transfer learning approach can be readily adapted to advances in foundational PLMs. We anticipate AbMAP will accelerate the efficient design and modeling of antibodies, expedite the discovery of antibody-based therapeutics, and deepen our understanding of humoral immunity.

Indexed as

SARS-CoV-2AntibodiesAntibodies, ViralCOVID-19HumansMutagenesisAntibodiesAntibodies, Viralantibody modelingprotein language modelstransfer learning

Identifiers

PMID39793083
PMCPMC11725859

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.