Evidence mapPaperPMID 39793978Full record

SynthesisRMD open2025

Efficacy and safety of non-pharmacological, pharmacological and surgical treatments for hand osteoarthritis in 2024: a systematic review.

Ingvild Kjeken, Daniel Huseby Bordvik, Nina Osteras, Ida K Haugen, Kristine Aasness Fjeldstad, Ingrid Skaalvik, Margreet Kloppenburg, Féline P B Kroon, Anne Therese Tveter, Geir Smedslund

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in RMD open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Ingvild KjekenHealth Services Research and Innovation Unit, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway Ingvild.Kjeken@diakonsyk.no.ORCID 0000-0002-3971-2852
Daniel Huseby BordvikHealth Services Research and Innovation Unit, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0009-0002-9333-4554
Nina OsterasHealth Services Research and Innovation Unit, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0001-8602-342X
Ida K HaugenCenter for Treatment of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Diseases (REMEDY), Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0001-7810-2216
Kristine Aasness FjeldstadHealth Services Research and Innovation Unit, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0009-0009-3288-289X
Ingrid SkaalvikHealth Services Research and Innovation Unit, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0009-0007-6065-323X
Margreet KloppenburgDepartment of Rheumatology, Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-9294-2307
Féline P B KroonDepartment of Rheumatology, Zuyderland Medical Center, Heerlen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-8940-0582
Anne Therese TveterHealth Services Research and Innovation Unit, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0003-1701-9835
Geir SmedslundHealth Services Research and Innovation Unit, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-4906-1213

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe aimed to update the 2018 systematic literature review on the efficacy and safety of treatments for hand osteoarthritis (OA), which was based on 126 studies.

methodsWe performed a systematic literature search on randomised controlled trials from June 2017 up to 31 December 2023. Risk of bias was assessed using the RoB2 tool. Meta-analyses of previous and new studies regarding the efficacy for pain, function, grip strength and OMERACT/OARSI responders were performed. Certainty of evidence was judged using the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) tool.

resultsSixty-five new studies were included. For non-pharmacological interventions, there was low-certainty evidence for a small long-term effect of hand exercises and a moderate long-term effect of thumb orthoses for pain, and moderate-certainty evidence that assistive devices had a moderate long-term effect on function. Concerning pharmacological interventions, there was low-certainty evidence for a moderate short-term effect of oral non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) on pain, high- and moderate-certainty evidence for a small short-term effect of topical NSAIDs and oral glucocorticoids on function, respectively, and low-certainty evidence that oral glucocorticoids had a small short-term effect on function. Further, there was low-certainty evidence that methotrexate had a small long-term effect on pain. The heterogeneity of studies did not allow for any meta-analyses on surgery.

conclusionThe results largely support current treatment recommendations. However, there is a lack of interventions that efficiently improve grip strength, and the evidence for most current treatments is still limited. To better understand action mechanism of different treatments, future trials should include hand OA subtyping and be powered for subgroup analyses.

Indexed as

HandOsteoarthritisAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalExercise TherapyGlucocorticoidsHand StrengthHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTreatment OutcomeAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalGlucocorticoidsOsteoarthritisOutcome Assessment, Health CarePain

Identifiers

PMID39793978
PMCPMC11749855

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.