ArticleScientific reports2025
SMR-guided molecular subtyping and machine learning model reveals novel prognostic biomarkers and therapeutic targets in non-small cell lung adenocarcinoma.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- RNA-binding protein RALYL-mediated BCL11B RNA stability promotes immune escape in small cell lung cancer through transcriptional activation of BUB3.Cellular oncology (Dordrecht, Netherlands) · 2026Article
- Causal inference of glucocorticoid signaling in non-small cell lung cancer: integrating Mendelian randomization, single-cell transcriptomics, and imaging data.NPJ precision oncology · 2026Article
- Comprehensive analysis of diverse cytokine patterns in the prognosis and tumor microenvironment of lung adenocarcinoma.Discover oncology · 2026Article
- Machine learning-based model identifies a novel cuproptosis-related mitochondrial gene signature with a key role in the prognosis and treatment of lung adenocarcinoma.Oncology letters · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Non-small cell lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) is a markedly heterogeneous disease, with its underlying molecular mechanisms and prognosis prediction presenting ongoing challenges. In this study, we integrated data from multiple public datasets, including TCGA, GSE31210, and GSE13213, encompassing a total of 867 tumor samples. By employing Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis, machine learning techniques, and comprehensive bioinformatics approaches, we conducted an in-depth investigation into the molecular characteristics, prognostic markers, and potential therapeutic targets of LUAD. Our analysis identified 321 genes significantly associated with LUAD, with CENP-A, MCM7, and DLGAP5 emerging as highly connected nodes in network analyses. By performing correlation analysis and Cox regression analysis, we identified 26 prognostic genes and classified LUAD samples into two molecular subtypes with significantly distinct survival outcomes. The Random Survival Forest (RSF) model exhibited robust prognostic predictive capabilities across multiple independent cohorts (AUC > 0.75). Beyond merely predicting patient outcomes, this model also captures key features of the tumor immune microenvironment and potential therapeutic responses. Functional enrichment analysis revealed the complex interplay of cell cycle regulation, DNA repair, immune response, and metabolic reprogramming in the progression of LUAD. Furthermore, we observed a strong correlation between risk scores and the expression of specific cytokines, such as CCL17, CCR2, and CCL20, suggesting novel avenues for developing cytokine network-based therapeutic strategies. This study offers fresh insights into the molecular subtyping, prognostic prediction, and personalized therapeutic decision-making in LUAD, laying a critical foundation for future clinical applications and targeted therapy research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.