Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39794510›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2025

Staging of prostate Cancer with ultra-fast PSMA-PET scans enhanced by AI.

David Kersting, Katarzyna Borys, Alina Küper, Moon Kim, Johannes Haubold, Tsepo Goerttler, Lale Umutlu, Pedro Fragoso Costa, Jens Kleesiek, Christoph Rischpler and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

David Kersting *Department of Nuclear Medicine and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstraße 55, Essen, 45147, Germany. david.kersting@uni-due.de.ORCID 0000-0002-8451-1830
Katarzyna Borys *Institute for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
Alina KüperDepartment of Nuclear Medicine and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstraße 55, Essen, 45147, Germany.
Moon KimInstitute for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
Johannes HauboldInstitute for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
Tsepo GoerttlerDepartment of Nuclear Medicine and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstraße 55, Essen, 45147, Germany.
Lale UmutluInstitute of Interventional and Diagnostic Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
Pedro Fragoso CostaDepartment of Nuclear Medicine and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstraße 55, Essen, 45147, Germany.
Jens KleesiekInstitute for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
Christoph RischplerDepartment of Nuclear Medicine and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstraße 55, Essen, 45147, Germany.
Felix NensaInstitute for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
Ken HerrmannDepartment of Nuclear Medicine and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstraße 55, Essen, 45147, Germany.
Wolfgang P FendlerDepartment of Nuclear Medicine and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstraße 55, Essen, 45147, Germany.
Manuel WeberDepartment of Nuclear Medicine and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstraße 55, Essen, 45147, Germany.
René Hosch *Institute for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
Robert Seifert *Department of Nuclear Medicine and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstraße 55, Essen, 45147, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePSMA-PET is a reference standard examination for patients with prostate cancer, but even using recently introduced digital PET detectors image acquisition with standard field-of-view scanners is still in the range of 20 min. This may cause limited access to examination slots because of the growing demand for PSMA-PET. Ultra-fast PSMA-PET may enhance throughput but comes at the cost of poor image quality. The aim of this manuscript is to evaluate the accuracy of AI-enhanced ultra-fast PSMA-PET for staging of patients with prostate cancer.

methodsA total number of 357 whole-body [

resultsThe AI-network significantly improved the visual image quality and detection rate in most miTNM regions compared with the non-enhanced image data (T: 69.6% vs. 43.5%, p < 0.05; N: 46.3% vs. 27.8%, p < 0.01; M1a 64.4% vs. 47.5%, p < 0.01; M1b: 85.7% vs. 72.1%, p < 0.01). However, improvement was not significant for the M1c category (42.9 vs. 28.6%, p > 0.05). Missed lesions had a smaller SUVmax and lesion size compared with detected lesions (exemplary for N: 9.5 vs. 26.5 SUVmax; 4 vs. 10 mm). SUVmax values of lesions were significantly different in all miTNM regions between the ultra-fast and reference standard PET, but only in the T-region between the AI-enhanced and reference standard PET.

conclusionThe AI-based image enhancement improved image quality and region detection rates by a mean of 17.9%. As the sensitivity of synthetic PET for small and low-uptake lesions was limited, a potential clinical use case could be disease monitoring in patients with high tumor volume and PSMA uptake undergoing PSMA radioligand therapy. The improvement in detection rate of distant metastases was not significant. This indicates that more training data is needed to ensure robust results also for lesions that have lower appearance frequency. Future studies on accelerated PSMA-PET seem warranted.

Indexed as

Edetic AcidGlutamate Carboxypeptidase IIPositron-Emission TomographyProstatic NeoplasmsAgedAntigens, SurfaceGallium IsotopesGallium RadioisotopesHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingTime FactorsAntigens, SurfaceEdetic AcidFOLH1 protein, humangallium 68 PSMA-11Gallium IsotopesGallium RadioisotopesGlutamate Carboxypeptidase IIArtificial IntelligenceDigital PETImage post-reconstructionLow-count PETPET/CT

Identifiers

PMID39794510
PMCPMC11928425

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.