ArticleEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2025
Machine learning can predict surgical indication: new clustering model from a large adult spine deformity database.
Article in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe choice of the best management for Adult Spine Deformity (ASD) is challenging. Health-related quality of life (HRQoL), comorbidities, symptoms and spine geometry, along with surgical risk and potential residual disability play a role, and a definite algorithm for patient management is lacking. Machine learning allows to analyse complex settings more efficiently than other available statistical tools. Aim of this study was to develop a machine-learning algorithm that, based on baseline data, would be able to predict whether an ASD patient would undergo surgery or not.
methodsRetrospective evaluation of prospectively collected data. Demographic data, HRQoL and radiographic parameters were collected. Two clustering methods were performed to differentiate groups of patients with similar characteristics. Three models were then used to identify the most relevant variables for management prediction.
resultsData from 1319 patients were available. Three clusters were identified: older subjects with sagittal imbalance and high PI, younger patients with greater coronal deformity and no sagittal imbalance, older patients with moderate sagittal imbalance and lower PI. The group of younger patients showed the highest error rate for the prediction (37%), which was lower for the other two groups (20-27%). For all groups, quality of life parameters such as the ODI and the SRS 22 and the Cobb angle of the major curve were the strongest predictors of surgical indication, albeit with different odds ratios in each group.
conclusionThree clusters could be identified along with the variables that, in each, are most likely to drive the choice of management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39794621What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.