ArticleLangenbeck's archives of surgery2025
Sleeve gastrectomy with antral resection provides more effective weight loss in patients with super obesity.
Article in Langenbeck's archives of surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Safety and Efficacy of Single- and Two-step Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery in the Setting of Obesity with ≥ 50 kg/mObesity surgery · 2025Pooled it
- Patient-reported outcomes after antrum resection versus antrum preservation in laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy patients: A retrospective cohort study.Saudi journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Saudi Gastroenterology Association · 2026Article
- Beyond the Procedure: Revisiting the Technical Determinants of Sleeve Gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass.Journal of metabolic and bariatric surgery · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundObesity is a growing health issue that contributes to numerous diseases and lowers quality of life. In patients with super obesity (BMI > 50 kg/m²), bariatric surgery, particularly laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG), is a common treatment option. However, the role of antral resection (AR) in LSG remains unclear, especially in this high-risk population. This study aims to compare the effectiveness of LSG with antral resection (LSG-AR) and LSG with antrum preservation (LSG-AP) on weight loss and postoperative complaints in patients with super obesity.
methodsThe medical records of patients with a BMI > 50 kg/m² who underwent LSG between 2016 and 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. Weight data were collected at admission, and at the first, second, and fifth-year follow-up. Patients were divided into two groups based on LSG-AR or LSG-AP procedures.
resultsSeventy-two patients were included. No significant difference was found in postoperative vomiting complaints between the groups (p = 0.67). First-year outcomes showed no significant differences in weight, BMI, or % Total Weight Loss (%TWL). However, second and fifth-year %TWL values were significantly higher in the LSG-AR group (p = 0.003 for both).
conclusionLSG-AR provides more effective long-term weight loss in patients with super obesity. Early postoperative vomiting complaints diminish over time, suggesting LSG-AR as a viable one-stage procedure for this patient population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.