ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2024
Lameness Recognition of Dairy Cows Based on Compensation Behaviour Analysis by Swing and Posture Features from Top View Depth Image.
Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Video-Based Detection of Dairy Cow Hoof-Slipping Behaviour Using Improved DeepLabCut and NeuFlow v2.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- Lameness detection in dairy cows from overhead view: high-precision keypoint localization and multi-feature fusion classification.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Top-view systems for lameness detection have advantages such as easy installation and minimal impact on farm work. However, the unclear lameness motion characteristics of the back result in lower recognition accuracy for these systems. Therefore, we analysed the compensatory behaviour of cows based on top-view walking videos, extracted compensatory motion features (CMFs), and constructed a model for recognising lameness in cows. By locating the hook, pin, sacrum, and spine positions, the motion trajectories of key points on the back were plotted. Based on motion trajectory analysis of 655 samples (258 sound, 267 mild lameness, and 130 severe lameness), the stability mechanisms of back movement posture were investigated, compensatory behaviours in lame cows were revealed, and methods for extracting CMFs were established, including swing and posture features. The feature correlation among differently scoring samples indicated that early-stage lame cows primarily exhibited compensatory swing, while those with severe lameness showed both compensatory swing and posture. Lameness classification models were constructed using machine learning and threshold discrimination methods, achieving classification accuracies of 81.6% and 83.05%, respectively. The threshold method reached a recall rate of 93.02% for sound cows. The proposed CMFs from back depth images are highly correlated with early lameness, improving the accuracy of top-view lameness detection systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.