ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2024
Characterization of Mesenchymal and Neural Stem Cells Response to Bipolar Microsecond Electric Pulses Stimulation.
Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Electrical stimulation and stem cell subdural implantation decrease microglia reactivity after spinal cord injury.Materials today. Bio · 2026Article
- Calcium oscillations in mesenchymal stem cells, a control on cell cycle progression to influence cell fate towards proliferation or differentiation?Stem cell research & therapy · 2025Article
- Neural Circuit Mapping and Neurotherapy-Based Strategies.Cellular and molecular neurobiology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In the tissue regeneration field, stem cell transplantation represents a promising therapeutic strategy. To favor their implantation, proliferation and differentiation need to be controlled. Several studies have demonstrated that stem cell fate can be controlled by applying continuous electric field stimulation. This study aims to characterize the effect of a specific microsecond electric pulse stimulation (bipolar pulses of 100 µs + 100 µs, delivered for 30 min at an intensity of 250 V/cm) to induce an increase in cell proliferation on mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) and induced neural stem cells (iNSCs). The effect was evaluated in terms of (i) cell counting, (ii) cell cycle, (iii) gene expression, and (iv) apoptosis. The results show that 24 h after the stimulation, cell proliferation, cell cycle, and apoptosis are not affected, but variation in the expression of specific genes involved in these processes is observed. These results led us to investigate cell proliferation until 72 h from the stimulation, observing an increase in the iNSCs number at this time point. The main outcome of this study is that the microsecond electric pulses can modulate stem cell proliferation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.