Evidence mapPaperPMID 39796419Full record

ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Global Insights into Cultured Meat: Uncovering Production Processes, Potential Hazards, Regulatory Frameworks, and Key Challenges-A Scoping Review.

Renata Puppin Zandonadi, Maíra Catharina Ramos, Flavia Tavares Silva Elias, Nathalia Sernizon Guimarães

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Renata Puppin ZandonadiDepartment of Nutrition, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Brasilia (UnB), Campus Darcy Ribeiro, Asa Norte, Brasilia 70910-900, DF, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-0370-3089
Maíra Catharina RamosProgram of Evidence for Health Policy and Technologies (PEPTS), Fiocruz Brasília, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation (Fiocruz), Asa Norte, Brasilia 70904-130, DF, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-3829-975X
Flavia Tavares Silva EliasProgram of Evidence for Health Policy and Technologies (PEPTS), Fiocruz Brasília, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation (Fiocruz), Asa Norte, Brasilia 70904-130, DF, Brazil.
Nathalia Sernizon GuimarãesDepartment of Nutrition, Nursing School, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Alfredo Balena Avenue, 190, Room 314, Santa Efigênia, Belo Horizonte 30130-100, MG, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-0487-0500

Funding

Actions for the Development of Health Regulation and Surveillance TED nº 001/2021
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This scoping review aims to understand the cell-based meat production process, including the regulations, potential hazards, and critical points of this production. This review includes studies on cultured meat production processes, health hazards, and regulatory guidelines, excluding those without hazard analysis, incomplete texts, or studies published before 2013. The search was performed in eight electronic databases (MEDLINE, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane Library, Scopus, LILACS, and Google Scholar) using MeSH terms and adaptations for each database. The search for local studies on regulations and guideline documents was complemented by a manual search on the websites of governments and regulatory agencies from different regions (e.g., FDA, FAO, EFSA, USDA, Health Canada, EC, EU, ANVISA/Brazil, MAPA/Brazil, FSANZ, and SFA). This step involved reading full texts to confirm eligibility and extract key data, including author, year, country, study design, objectives, results, cultured meat protocols, health hazards, and hazard control measures, followed by data analysis. A comprehensive search of the databases yielded 1185 studies and 46 regulatory or guidance documents. After removing duplicate studies and applying eligibility criteria to titles, abstracts and full texts, 35 studies and 45 regulatory or guidance documents were included. The cultured meat production protocols are well-established, highlighting potential hazards and critical control points. Although guidance documents and regulations are limited, they are expanding globally. The development and commercialization of cultured meat require clear, and up-to-date regulations and supervision, which are being studied and formulated by regulatory agencies worldwide. Cultured meat production presents some potential hazards (chemical, biological, and physical) that require food safety considerations: (i) genetic stability of cells/cell lines; (ii) microbiological hazards related to cell lines; (iii) exposure to substances used in the production process; (iv) toxicity and allergenicity of the product or its component for the population; (v) post-harvest microbiological contamination; (vi) chemical contamination/residue levels; and (vii) nutritional aspects/risks. Currently, no standardized testing approach exists for cultured meat. However, effective hazard and safety assessment strategies, such as HACCP combined with best practices, should be implemented throughout the production process.

Indexed as

cell-based meathazardslaboratory meatlegislationsafety

Identifiers

PMID39796419
PMCPMC11720233

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.