SynthesisNutrients2024
The Role of Nutrient Supplements in Female Infertility: An Umbrella Review and Hierarchical Evidence Synthesis.
Synthesis in Nutrients, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Pooled it
- The auxiliary effect of oral nutritional supplements on fertility in women with diminished ovarian reserve: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Annals of medicine · 2025Pooled it
- The Efficacy and Safety of Nutritional Supplements for Cancer Supportive Care: An Umbrella Review and Hierarchical Evidence Synthesis.Integrative cancer therapiesPooled it
- Metabolites and proteins may mediate the relationship between diet quality and insulin sensitivity in young adult cohort.Journal of diabetes and metabolic disorders · 2026Article
- Therapeutic Roles and Safety Profiles of Non-Vitamin Antioxidant Supplements in Female Infertility: A Narrative Review.Journal of family & reproductive health · 2026Review
- Vitamin D in Endocrine Disorders: A Broad Overview of Evidence in Musculoskeletal, Thyroid, Parathyroid, and Reproductive Disorders.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Efficacy and safety of nutritional supplements in female infertility: a network meta-analysis.Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E · 2025Review
- The Role of Vitamins in Preconception Care and Infertility Treatment: A Narrative Review.Reproductive medicine and biologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivesNutrient supplements are commonly used to improve fertility outcomes by women with infertility trying to conceive spontaneously or utilising medically assisted reproduction (MAR). However, despite their widespread use and perceived safety, there is a lack of clear guidance on the efficacy and safety of these supplements for female infertility. The aim of this umbrella review was to identify the best available and most recent evidence on the efficacy and safety of nutrient supplements for female infertility to provide evidence-based guidance for clinicians and reproductive couples.
methodsFive electronic databases were searched for umbrella reviews, meta-analyses, and systematic reviews of randomised controlled trials on nutrient supplements for female infertility, published from August 2017 to January 2024. The primary outcomes were live birth, and clinical and biochemical pregnancy rates. Secondary outcomes were adverse effects including miscarriage and ectopic or multiple pregnancy. Quality assessment was performed using the A MeaSurement Tool to Assess systematic Reviews Version 2.0 (AMSTAR 2), and the certainty of evidence for outcomes were assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach, where possible.
resultsFour meta-analyses were included. Multiple micronutrients and antioxidants increased live birth rates in women utilising MAR and/or trying to conceive spontaneously compared to placebo, standard or no treatment (odds ratio (OR) 2.59 and 1.81 respectively) with very low certainty evidence. L-carnitine, coQ10, melatonin, myo-inositol, NAC and vitamin D increased clinical pregnancy rates in women with PCOS and/or undergoing MAR compared to placebo, standard or no treatment (odds ratio (OR) 11.14, 2.49, 1.66, relative risk (RR) 1.52, OR 2.15, and 1.49 respectively) with very low certainty evidence. Vitamin D did not increase biochemical pregnancy rates in women utilising MAR with very low certainty evidence. NAC, vitamin D, and pooled antioxidants had no effect on miscarriage rates or multiple pregnancy rates in women trying to conceive spontaneously or utilising MAR, with low to very low certainty evidence. Pooled antioxidants had no effect on ectopic pregnancy rates in women trying to conceive spontaneously or utilising MAR, with low certainty evidence.
conclusionsThe available evidence is insufficient to recommend nutrient supplementation to improve female infertility in women trying to conceive naturally and those utilising MAR. However, there is currently no indication that these nutrients pose any risk of significant harm. REGISTRATION: PROSPERO (CRD42022365966) 20 October 2022.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.