Evidence mapPaperPMID 39796491Full record

SynthesisNutrients2024

The Role of Nutrient Supplements in Female Infertility: An Umbrella Review and Hierarchical Evidence Synthesis.

Chhiti Pandey, Alison Maunder, Jing Liu, Vaishnavi Vaddiparthi, Michael F Costello, Mahnaz Bahri-Khomami, Aya Mousa, Carolyn Ee

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Nutrients, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Chhiti PandeyNICM Health Research Institute, Western Sydney University, Penrith, NSW 2751, Australia.
Alison MaunderNICM Health Research Institute, Western Sydney University, Penrith, NSW 2751, Australia.
Jing LiuNICM Health Research Institute, Western Sydney University, Penrith, NSW 2751, Australia.
Vaishnavi VaddiparthiNICM Health Research Institute, Western Sydney University, Penrith, NSW 2751, Australia.
Michael F CostelloWomen's Health, University of New South Wales and Royal Hospital for Women and Monash IVF, Sydney, NSW 2031, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7340-1356
Mahnaz Bahri-KhomamiMonash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC 3168, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5955-1283
Aya MousaMonash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC 3168, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7356-4523
Carolyn EeNICM Health Research Institute, Western Sydney University, Penrith, NSW 2751, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3363-9199

Funding

Anonymous Not Applicable
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesNutrient supplements are commonly used to improve fertility outcomes by women with infertility trying to conceive spontaneously or utilising medically assisted reproduction (MAR). However, despite their widespread use and perceived safety, there is a lack of clear guidance on the efficacy and safety of these supplements for female infertility. The aim of this umbrella review was to identify the best available and most recent evidence on the efficacy and safety of nutrient supplements for female infertility to provide evidence-based guidance for clinicians and reproductive couples.

methodsFive electronic databases were searched for umbrella reviews, meta-analyses, and systematic reviews of randomised controlled trials on nutrient supplements for female infertility, published from August 2017 to January 2024. The primary outcomes were live birth, and clinical and biochemical pregnancy rates. Secondary outcomes were adverse effects including miscarriage and ectopic or multiple pregnancy. Quality assessment was performed using the A MeaSurement Tool to Assess systematic Reviews Version 2.0 (AMSTAR 2), and the certainty of evidence for outcomes were assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach, where possible.

resultsFour meta-analyses were included. Multiple micronutrients and antioxidants increased live birth rates in women utilising MAR and/or trying to conceive spontaneously compared to placebo, standard or no treatment (odds ratio (OR) 2.59 and 1.81 respectively) with very low certainty evidence. L-carnitine, coQ10, melatonin, myo-inositol, NAC and vitamin D increased clinical pregnancy rates in women with PCOS and/or undergoing MAR compared to placebo, standard or no treatment (odds ratio (OR) 11.14, 2.49, 1.66, relative risk (RR) 1.52, OR 2.15, and 1.49 respectively) with very low certainty evidence. Vitamin D did not increase biochemical pregnancy rates in women utilising MAR with very low certainty evidence. NAC, vitamin D, and pooled antioxidants had no effect on miscarriage rates or multiple pregnancy rates in women trying to conceive spontaneously or utilising MAR, with low to very low certainty evidence. Pooled antioxidants had no effect on ectopic pregnancy rates in women trying to conceive spontaneously or utilising MAR, with low certainty evidence.

conclusionsThe available evidence is insufficient to recommend nutrient supplementation to improve female infertility in women trying to conceive naturally and those utilising MAR. However, there is currently no indication that these nutrients pose any risk of significant harm. REGISTRATION: PROSPERO (CRD42022365966) 20 October 2022.

Indexed as

Dietary SupplementsInfertility, FemaleAntioxidantsFemaleHumansLive BirthMicronutrientsPregnancyPregnancy RateRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicReproductive Techniques, AssistedAntioxidantsMicronutrientsassisted reproductive techniquesdietary supplementsfemale fertility agentsfemale infertilitypregnancy complicationspregnancy rateumbrella review

Identifiers

PMID39796491
PMCPMC11722770

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.