ArticleNutrients2024
Individual and Joint Associations Between Animal and Plant Protein Intakes with Impaired Fasting Glucose and Type 2 Diabetes in the Framingham Offspring Study.
Article in Nutrients, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesGiven the considerable discrepancy in the literature regarding dietary protein and glucose homeostasis, we examined the prospective association between protein intake (total, animal, plant) and risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus or impaired fasting glucose (IFG). We also examined whether these associations differed by sex, body weight, or other risk factors.
methodsWe included 1423 subjects, aged ≥ 30 years, in the Framingham Offspring Study cohort. Three-day dietary records at exams 3 and 5 were used to average protein intake and then adjusted for body weight residuals. Cox proportional hazard models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HR), adjusting for anthropometric, demographic, and lifestyle factors over ~16 years of follow-up.
resultsSubjects with the highest total protein intakes (≥100 g men; ≥85 g women) had a 31% lower risk of type 2 diabetes/IFG (95% CI: 0.54, 0.87). The highest (vs. lowest) category of intake of animal protein was associated with a 32% lower risk of diabetes/IFG (95% CI: 0.55, 0.83), whereas plant protein was not. Beneficial trends of total protein, especially animal, were stronger for women (HR: 0.61; 95% CI: 0.42, 0.87) than for men (HR: 0.82; 95% CI 0.58, 1.15). Subjects with lower BMI who consumed more protein had the lowest risks of diabetes/IFG.
conclusionsOverall, in this prospective study, higher intake of total dietary protein, including the consumption of animal protein, particularly among individuals with lower BMI and higher physical activity levels, was inversely associated with risk of incident type 2 diabetes and IFG.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.