ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Issues and Limitations on the Road to Fair and Inclusive AI Solutions for Biomedical Challenges.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence in echocardiography: a position statement from the British Society of Echocardiography.Echo research and practice · 2026Review
- Impact of Pollution on Mental Health: A Systematic Review of Associations, Methodological Challenges, and Future Directions.Health science reports · 2026Review
- Hearts, Data, and Artificial Intelligence Wizardry: From Imitation to Innovation in Cardiovascular Care.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Dentistry: A Narrative Review of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Applications.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveIn this paper, we explore the correlation between performance reporting and the development of inclusive AI solutions for biomedical problems. Our study examines the critical aspects of bias and noise in the context of medical decision support, aiming to provide actionable solutions. Contributions: A key contribution of our work is the recognition that measurement processes introduce noise and bias arising from human data interpretation and selection. We introduce the concept of "noise-bias cascade" to explain their interconnected nature. While current AI models handle noise well, bias remains a significant obstacle in achieving practical performance in these models. Our analysis spans the entire AI development lifecycle, from data collection to model deployment. RECOMMENDATIONS: To effectively mitigate bias, we assert the need to implement additional measures such as rigorous study design; appropriate statistical analysis; transparent reporting; and diverse research representation. Furthermore, we strongly recommend the integration of uncertainty measures during model deployment to ensure the utmost fairness and inclusivity. These comprehensive recommendations aim to minimize both bias and noise, thereby improving the performance of future medical decision support systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.