Evidence mapPaperPMID 39797136Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2024

Glycated Hemoglobin and Cardiovascular Disease in Patients Without Diabetes.

Grzegorz K Jakubiak, Artur Chwalba, Aleksandra Basek, Grzegorz Cieślar, Natalia Pawlas

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Grzegorz K JakubiakDepartment of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medical Sciences in Zabrze, Medical University of Silesia, Jordana 38 St., 41-800 Zabrze, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-0039-8306
Artur ChwalbaDepartment of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medical Sciences in Zabrze, Medical University of Silesia, Jordana 38 St., 41-800 Zabrze, Poland.
Aleksandra BasekDepartment of Internal Medicine, Angiology, and Physical Medicine, Faculty of Medical Sciences in Zabrze, Medical University of Silesia, Batorego 15 St., 41-902 Bytom, Poland.
Grzegorz CieślarDepartment of Internal Medicine, Angiology, and Physical Medicine, Faculty of Medical Sciences in Zabrze, Medical University of Silesia, Batorego 15 St., 41-902 Bytom, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-2210-8744
Natalia PawlasDepartment of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medical Sciences in Zabrze, Medical University of Silesia, Jordana 38 St., 41-800 Zabrze, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-7551-9371

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) are one of the most critical public health problems in the contemporary world because they are the leading cause of morbidity and mortality. Diabetes mellitus (DM) is one of the most substantial risk factors for developing CVDs. Glycated hemoglobin is a product of the non-enzymatic glycation of hemoglobin present in erythrocytes. The determination of the percentage of glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) is commonly used in clinical practice to assess glycemic control in patients diagnosed with DM. This method is much more informative than repeated blood glucose tests, because the HbA1c value reflects the degree of glycemic control over the last three months. It is, therefore, not surprising that the HbA1c value correlates with the presence and severity of diabetes complications, including CVDs, in the population of diabetic patients. The purpose of this publication was to present the results of a literature review on the relationship between the HbA1c value in people without DM, the presence and severity of subclinical cardiovascular dysfunction, and the presence of clinically overt CVDs. The most important tools used to assess subclinical cardiovascular dysfunction included the measurement of intima-media thickness (IMT), especially carotid IMT (cIMT), arterial stiffness assessment by the measurement of pulse wave velocity (PWV), and ankle-brachial index (ABI). According to the results of the studies cited in this literature review, it can be concluded that there are certain relationships between HbA1c, the presence and severity of subclinical cardiovascular dysfunction, and the presence of clinically overt CVDs such as coronary heart disease, cerebrovascular disease, and chronic lower extremity ischemia in non-diabetic patients. It is worth noting, however, that the results of studies conducted so far in this area are not fully unambiguous. Further studies are needed to better understand the influence of additional factors on the relationship between HbA1c and cardiovascular dysfunction in non-diabetic patients.

Indexed as

ankle–brachial indexarterial stiffnessatherosclerotic cardiovascular diseaseendothelial dysfunctionglycated hemoglobinintima-media thicknesspulse wave velocity

Identifiers

PMID39797136
PMCPMC11721913

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.