ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2024
Refining Stroke Risk Assessment in Patients with Device-Detected Atrial Fibrillation.
Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comment on "Efficacy and safety of antihypertensive drugs deprescribing in older adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials".International journal of cardiology. Cardiovascular risk and prevention · 2026Article
- Atrial Fibrillation Screening Driven by Monitoring Technologies: Reducing Stroke Burden in Asian Populations.JACC. Asia · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Clinical atrial fibrillation (AF) is a well-established major risk factor for stroke and systemic embolism. Pivotal trials have shown that treatment with oral anticoagulation reduces the risk of stroke and systemic embolism in clinical AF with a simultaneous increase in the risk of major bleeding. To help balance the risk of stroke and bleeding in clinical AF, different prediction models including biomarkers and clinical features have been validated. Device-detected AF (DDAF) is also associated with an increased risk of stroke and systemic embolism, but not to the same extent as clinical AF. Two large randomised studies have found significant stroke risk reduction with direct oral anticoagulation in DDAF patients, yet also a significantly increased risk of major bleeding. To date, the question remains how to balance the thromboembolic risk reduction with oral anticoagulation and the increased risk of bleeding in patients with DDAF and to identify the right patients who may benefit from oral anticoagulant treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.